Their Witcher game wasn’t a dungeon crawler, you’re thinking of Descent for their fantasy based dungeon crawler. The Witcher was a sort of talisman-ish kind of game (I haven’t played it, go easy on me.) as far as I have seen.

I appreciate the well thought out response here. Yup, that last bit made no sense. Better get up to date :) I’m glad you seem to understand how confusing it can look to someone :) Off to a friends, they have one of the collections and have said I can borrow it.

I didn’t until very recently. Where is the number? Because it isn’t on the game box from what I can tell.

As someone who played them on ps2 then was waiting to hear about the next big KH game, I thought they were side stories until very recently. They were all pretty much on handheld, not big console releases too, so that probably plays a part in that too.

As someone who played them on ps2 then was waiting to hear about the next big KH game, I thought they were side stories until very recently. They were all pretty much on handheld, not big console releases too, so that probably plays a part in that especially since the next one has a number again.

Sorry, but if it’s not numbered on the box, then it’s not really numbered to the average fan. Naming stuff is important, if you make the second game Kingdom Hearts 2, then name the next one number 3, otherwise people relegate it to side stuff. Not my fault they made it confusing on the surface to the average fan, but…

I do have a PS4, less than $40 each in the US, they’re more expensive where I am, but yeah, that solves the buying part over all. Finding the time to play that many games might be a challenge if they are all around the first two KH game’s length.

Then why weren’t they numbered entries? I regular gaming sites and never got the impression they were necessary until this year, so now I have 5 games I have to play/buy before getting the third entry to a series I played and waited patiently for the 3rd game since the original two launched on PS2.

I’ve gone with X-Wing, Armada and Imperial Assault... Mistakes were made, but I do not regret it!

I’ve gone with X-Wing, Armada and Imperial Assault... Mistakes were made, but I do not regret it!

You weren’t discounting my idea, past DBZ games have done it like how you thought, so it’s not far fetched to assume that’s what I meant.

You never know, could work like the clash system in Injustice and Injustice 2, bid an amount of super meter and the winner does damage. Was just a thought, it nmot being in the game isn’t a deal breaker, but beam struggles are very DBZ.

That is really cool!

Which game was that, will have a look.

Yeah, I like that too, no character jumping in suddenly and getting juggled to hell and back with little to no chance.

Budokai 3 let you do it too, was cool. Perhpas the game does have it in some form, will just have to wait and find out.

Same here, some are saying like a dozen characters based on their games in the past, but if that’s the case then the game will have half the roster in one fight, which would get damn old quick.

For a game focusing on 3v3, I hope it’s more like about 20 characters. I’m not expecting 30-40 or anything, but if it’s 12 ish, in one match, half the roster could be involved, would get pretty old quick.

12-14 is pretty small, especially since the game seems focused around 3v3 matches, I would hope for at least 20 or so to be honest, but I guess we’ll just have to wait and see.

As long as I can blast spirit bombs and kamehameha waves at my opponents, I will be happy. Thanks for the reassurance though :)