Ok I didn’t listen to her entire podcast on this, just the clip she shared on IG. Based on this small clip, I guess I understand her point, but Judaism is a religion and an ethnicity, so which one are non-Jews supposed to avoid playing? Especially as Jewish actors have played non-Jews (and often played other…

Is Sarah trolling?

It kind of feels like hearing that cigarette companies knew their product caused cancer or that oil companies knew that global warming was an issue for decades while they lied and sowed doubt. The actual damage they’re doing isn’t the part of it that’s news, it’s that they were fully aware of it all along.

A lot of words to essentially say “why didn’t she speak up then instead of years later claiming to be uncomfortable” which sounds very much like victim shaming.

I’m in reruns on this, but people need to stop asking famous (or otherwise) people about their friends who have been accused of sex crimes.

That’s where everyone’s mind goes first - mine did too - but once you get past that you realize that he was also listening to conversations she thought were private. Inmates in prisons at least get to talk to their lawyers in private. Imagine having to live in such a way that everything you say is recorded for the…

I am adhd/autistic and I 100% could not remember all that choreography, could not handle public appearances, etc. I'm also a fully functional adult in charge of my own finances.

In no way should recording the sounds from your grown daughter’s bedroom indicate that you are a sexual predator, at all. 

Not to mention remembering a whole show worth choreography which isn't easy as well as carrying on conversations at meet and greets etc! 

In many cases, conservatorship is really about money and control. Limiting access to the person is part of that. This situation with Britney is so messed up with so many red flags that it is mind boggling. Just one red flag here: if she was so mentally incapacitated, how does that jibe with doing a one person show in…

Sorry, I misunderstood what you wrote. I thought you were saying he said that. I didn’t get that you were saying the last line of the article implied that. ETA: He’s said terrible things to his first wife (“I’m the alpha in this relationship,” on their wedding night). That’s where my confusion came from.

Someone said it well last week: “Jezebel isn’t even trying anymore.”

Oh, I get it: *he’s* terrible, so therefore we call *her* a prostitute. Makes sense.

Because they spend most, if not all, of it back here. It’s entirely self-serving. 

It’s not great that she voted “present” instead of taking a stand, and it’s not great that she apparently did so for cynical political reasons (also, in the end, it’s not going to stop the criticism, it’s just a matter of changing the attack ad copy from “AOC voted ‘No’ on protecting Israeli lives” to “AOC refused to…

I mean, why can’t Israel fund their own missile defense? I am not against international spending to help with humanitarian crises, especially when in many cases we either directly or indirectly caused those crises but Israel is a relatively rich country why are we propping up their military spending? So they can…

If this guy’s random-ass lawsuit goes through and the burden of proof is on the doctor to prove a negative or violate his patient’s privacy, then theoretically someone should sue the shit out of Greg Abbott, Ted Cruz, Ken Paxton, John Cronyn, Boof Cavanaugh, and all those assholes down the line for unprovable abortions…

Now I’m wondering what is involved in actually suing someone under this utterly absurd law. To be clear, I am 100% opposed to this law, but I’m intrigued by the notion of as many ridiculous lawsuits being filed as possible (only against the provider who has bravely taken on this burden) so as to decimate this law. Can…

But no no, it has nothing to do with her background and entirely to do with her attitude!*

Yet Harry and Meghan are just a hair above his public approval rate. Good to know introducing a smidge of color to the bloodline is still marginally more favorable than protecting an (alleged) pedo within it.