Cerebros
Cerebros
Cerebros

From the post you didn't read: "Nathan Grayson did write about Depression Quest in RockPaperShotgun". Your response: "No". Here: "Anyway, standouts: powerful Twine darling Depression Quest". You squeal "inaccurate", but you're claiming that "no", Adam Smith exclusively wrote about Depression Quest on RPS and Nathan

You null your own point with a sentence like "3 highlight games in an article about 50 new steam greenlight".

Nathan Grayson did write about Depression Quest in RockPaperShotgun. Entire line of thought (100,000 words up there) post-empted.

Your failure to refute my previous post is evidence that you have been corrected. You're correct that claiming you're right does not make you right - claiming you haven't been corrected does not mean you haven't been. There's the onus to provide proof, which I have provided plenty and you, offered none. I'm more than

Again, to you, "Sitting upright" and "moving chess pieces" are not exercises that improve fitness, but to less-abled, those exercises can and do improve fitness. You cannot make a personal subjective distinction to favour your argument. I don't know your "lifestyle", but you probably took a wrong turn somewhere to not

No, it usually doesn't. That is usually a civil, not a criminal, matter. Understand the distinction.

The brain is a physical object: we use and train it to make decisions. It's no different than the hamstrings, biceps, or any other part of the body; it fatigues; it makes connections; its damage affects performance. How the fuck do you think that you're even typing and replying to people or that you suck at debating?

So, you're claiming that using the brain, sitting upright, and moving chess pieces aren't physical exercises? Of course they fucking are, dolt - you don't get to decide the degree.

Tell your Grandkids of this day!

That was in response to ramajastang's claim "it's an accident" which he had no basis or evidence to state, not pertaining to any legal case where the onus would be on the prosecutors.

You're attempting to project the rational on to the irrational. Anyone who has played sports before, has witnessed thousands of examples of a player doing something that is stupid and moronic, and detrimental to their self-interest (Luis Suarez?). It's no defense of Tony Stewart to claim that he isn't stupid enough

'Sense' isn't a language idiots use or understand as well as others. For any claim, there has to be evidence supporting said claim. Will you provide the evidence that this was an accident? Of course, you had fucking none when you screeched said claim. You're confusing the 'innocent until proven guilty' assumption in a

Tony offered the gig, but wanted to pay in a currency I couldn't accept. It's good that in you he found someone. Say, what's the exchange rate for converting 'blowjobs' to 'euros'?

Are you his lawyer? That first sentence is morally disgusting: using the word 'accident' front and center to attempt to monopolize the language of the incident. Tony should explain himself if he's innocent of intent to harm; however, if he's guilty, he should wisely shut the fuck up, which as his lawyer, you've wisely

You implied that they play against seasoned pros: i.e. play in a minor league. The Minor league in baseball doesn't preclude older pros from entry. So, either take the hit for that error or accurately present your argument by specifying that only college-age Football players can enter the Minor league. I'm accurately

You're either a 'tard or a lackey. NCAA is a middle-man exploiting a gap in the career of a Football player - what part of that exploitation do you have trouble understanding? Do you think that the NFL want players as young as 17 entering competition against seasoned pros on steroids and expertly-designed

Whatever floats your boat. whatever tide you ride in on. However, the main purpose of entertainment is to stimulate. The more experience you have of a specific entertainment, the more sophisticated your response to the stimulus provided by said specific entertainment. In a simple but analogous example, it wouldn't

No exercise program is 100% safe; however, the percentage of safety in an arm curl is significantly higher than an olympic snatch. I'm athletic: play a variety of sports and lift weights. After a year of reading and watching form and cues from good strength & conditioning coaches for, and performing, hang cleans, I

I skimmed through it because I don't want to spoil the game for me, but I get the gist and it makes good points. STALKER is one of my favourite games, but Halo 1 and Half Life 2 are, too. All three are different types of games and all greatly succeeded in their execution of what experience they're designed to be. I