Cave-Johnson
Cave Johnson
Cave-Johnson

I, for one, am with the person who wrote this article.
I have an iphone 4 running 5.1.2, and a friend of mine has his trusty 4 still running 4.3.
Now, the thing is: How much more complex is ios5 compared to ios4? Notification center? Well that's a REAL resource waster, isn't it?

The thing is, that my friend's 4 is heaps

Thank you for this.

You forgot one minor detail. Every wave that bounces off a surface and gets reflected inverts its phase. Therefore the signal that would, in your theory, amplify the soundwaves, will in fact follow them phase-inverted, ,therefore cancelling them.

This exists, high-end windows installers can, for an extreme price, add small speakers inbetween the glasspanes of your windows, and put microphones outside of the door.
It can be done. It's just not cheap.

Oh yeah, now that apple's switched over to IGZO it will surely improve the battery life by heaps, and they will surely trump dell's new XPS15.
Right guys?
Right?

Still, stepper motors are the most complex solution and don't necessarily mean true 1:1 mapping, say a tire slips on some water, or a cat bumps into the thing and rotates it ever so slightly, but multiplicated by the distances it has to cover this could lead to complete f**k-ups in terms of where the robot thinks it

but i do care :D

After about 2 years, i still cannot understand who "rainydayinterns" or "rainydaymagazine" is/are
the magic of the internet.

After about 2 years, i still cannot understand who "rainydayinterns" or "rainydaymagazine" is/are
the magic of the internet.

Wouldn't storing the maps in memory and calculating new routes eventually result in a very efficient trajectory for the robot to follow? Also it would know how far it could go from base before coming back, or how much water it could load for eventually cleaning tile floors in bathrooms (maybe next-gen robots will have

I thought everything iRobot did for the home was spiral and sensor based? So the higher end roombas have mapping abilities?

What i'm wondering all these years is how didn't they come up with a robot that, you know, doesn't just roll around chaotically and bumping into corners all the time. Why didn't they make a robot that, given the position of the base, rotation in respect to the base and distance of the base, will automatically create a

I desperately want a full frame fuji XPRO1 with interchangeable lenses around the 2000-2500$ mark. EVFs just don't cut it for me, i want them optical, or better off, hybrid with possibility for attaching leica lenses and have focus detection and a virtual focus assistant INSIDE the hybrid viewfinder.
Would be a killer.

the NASA link is...down....

forums, forums, forums, and record pools

Wow
Such article
Much words
So information
Wow

how? tesla. That's how.
Take my word for it, hell, I AM science.

Oh you...

Macbook pros... Macbook oris... Macbook pros...
COME ON APPLEEE

it probably is. Only supercaps would have the ability to supply the modulated current fast and reliably enough to actually work as TC