He also thinks Akie Abe doesn’t speak English.

Walk into any dementia-care area of a nursing home and you can have basically the same conversation. I’m not kidding.

Thanks for the additional information!

Ah, interesting, thank you. Glad someone was finally able to help clear this up. So it is different from the UK thing, but also does not impact any person buying things as an individual, just US corporations buying things.

The struggle is real, y’all.

I’m not concern trolling. I want to find out what this actually does and everyone here seems to be more concerned with hyperbolic freakouts. The fines and jail time sound very bad but I can’t find anything in the bill that says that and no one will point me to where it is. The NY Times article said it was a thing but…

Where did I say both sides do anything? WTF do you think I’m saying here?

Everything can be twisted in the hands of psychos. They don’t need a clarification on a 1979 law for that. But I am proud of you for admitting you don’t care for being realistic. A lot of people can’t do that.

I’m not defending this, I think it’s stupid political theater. I’m just pointing out that an overreaction doesn’t help anything as if you accuse it of doing things it doesn’t do, that can be used to undermine your argument. Find out what it actually does and then argue against that specifically. We can all afford to…

Can we please not by hyperbolic right now? Thanks. I want to discuss what the bill is actually capable of, should it pass. Cause what I’m seeing is not much. I still want to know where people got the fines and jail time from as that wasn’t in the bill. Someone let me know where that’s coming from cause it wasn’t in…

Just did. Looks like everyone whining about Sodastream is wrong. The bill is about foreign nations boycotting Israel and saying the US cannot offer support or endorse those boycotts. It’s backlash against the UN calling for a boycott of Israel and calling for governments to stop doing business with it and the US is…

Because he’s an idiot.

Except he didn’t receive a near black out. He received less coverage than his more well known, more likely to win opponent. “Near” still means “almost complete,” and he was far from a complete blackout. He received coverage. I also love how you’re ignoring that the coverage he received was overwhelmingly positive…

Are you serious? Do you really think that those are the only three articles in that period? They aren’t. They are examples of lengthy articles about Sanders during the early-mid primary period when you claim he suffered from a “near black out” by the media.

1. Bernie Sanders tried to use his 5 minutes of wokeness in the 1960s before hightailing it to the whitest place on Earth all through the election. And when he wasn’t doing it his fans were falsely trying to lay claim that any white guy in glasses in a photo from any Civil rights march was really Sanders. And he…

That’s also my problem with Sanders himself. He won’t do the work. He makes great floor speeches, but hasn’t been willing to do the hard work of coalition building.

You’re adorable.

He is not a Democrat. Therefore, he should not be the Democratic presidential nominee.

All of this. And if I hear another bro try to tell me he marched with King, I’m throwing hands.

Disclaimer: I do not hate Bernie Sanders. He does not owe me money. It’s really not that deep to me, fam. That white man means a whole lot more to Bernie bros than he will ever mean to me. I just want him to campaign better for black votes—especially those of black women. That said ...