Prescient...

...I hope the rest of us can figure out how to do without them, either.

Well to be fair, if I were president i’d be asking about that shit too

How much you want to bet that the things he did request briefings for were “aliens” and “Gina”?

“ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT DELIVERY MEN ACTING AS ABORTION PILL MULES IN JEW YORK”

THANK YOU. When people tell me that Bernie would have won, I’m like, “oh honey, do you understand the masses and how they collectively really feel about the jews?”

I’m in PA. The assholes who voted for this don’t regret shit.

I don’t know that never changing or growing as a woman over 40 years of a lifetime is something to be proud of . . .

AFAIK, unless things have changed post-acquisition, you have to get followed by the main site or sub-blog. The regular writers have the ability to do this, but I don’t think there was ever a formal policy in place - in my experience they mostly seem to do it on a whim if you make enough decent comments that get pushed…

in laws who voted trump in wisconsin here. the simple answer to your question is “no”

An outdated system specifically designed to promote and protect wealthy white men at the expense of everyone else at that. Did its job.

They’re only human rights abuses if you see the victims as human.

Don’t worry, if you remember your history correctly:

I assume the lawyers are pro-lifers and they were delighted to file this argument in support of their broader goal to have embryos recognized as persons under the 14th amendment, entitled to equal protection of the law. This isn’t just one guy being an abusive dick to his famous ex. This case is perfectly consistent…

I’m just saying practice caution. If the one posting to your thread has only made a total of one comment and it’s sounds bigoted, dismiss. If he’s spamming the same comment on multiple threads on the article, dismiss. If that person’s comments history includes that person making bigoted statements, dismiss.

Conversely, having spent a lot of time in the greys myself a couple of years ago and knowing how frustrating it can be, I try to ungrey every non-troll reply when in a position to do so, even if I don’t necessarily agree with their point.

Loeb’s whole argument is that the embryos have to be implanted because of the trusts in their names, right? That makes no sense to me because:

I’ve seen sofas that had much more DNA and reproductove material in them than those embryos combined.

The death penalty is pretty ineffective too. Not only does it not deter crime, but it doesn’t help the victims families, while news media love to wring out “I’m getting closure” from family members, interviews later often show they gained nothing from it.

IMO for cases where guilt is assured beyond any doubt, life in a…

There’s an excellent article from a while back (I think right after the Charlie Hebdo attacks) by Cracked’s David Wong that makes the following argument: the fight in modern times is not between “us” and “them,” the winner to be determined by whichever one is still alive at the end. That’s the world of our ancestors…