He was caught downloading Peter Scully’s material, which has got to be the worst stuff on the internet (if worse exists, I don’t want to know about it) and involves children as young as 18 months old. Jessa is lying, brainwashed or misinformed.

I think their complaints are 100% legit, but yeah, most of this is garden variety sexism & harassment that women face in every industry and isn’t unique to pageants. It sounds like a lot of them bought the marketing hype that they were being promoted for their intelligence and plans for world peace, instead of how…

This is one of these stories where it’s a blessing the grays exist. Butthurt men howling silently into the void will never not be a thing of beauty.

asking for trouble

I once met a woman who claimed they hooked up when she was 16. I, uh...believed her.

They’re a cute couple. That’s all I got. I don’t get the hype with height difference in general. I’m a tall lady and have dated men both shorter and taller than me, and noticed no difference in terms of kissing feasibility etc.

He’s serving cokehead youth pastor for me. The dumb Polaroid analogy is right up their alley.

You hold it and shake it, waiting for the picture to appear, but suddenly someone walks by and snatches your photo, ripping it to shreds. You cry, ‘Why did you destroy my picture?’” the congressman wailed. “The callous passerby then asserts that because the Polaroid ‘wasn’t fully developed yet,’ it was ‘not a picture.’

Oh I don’t think Jezebel is the one normalizing Prostasia’s work on purpose. I think Prostasia is using this (very reasonable sounding) research to get positive press for the overall organization on large platforms like Jezebel, which is concerning given their actual track record.

RIGHT? I’m pretty grossed out by the way this research is being presented alongside a not-so-subtle endorsement of this extremely questionable organization.

It’s a Prostasia talking point. The whole article is filled with Prostasia talking points, which is interesting since it claims to be focused on scientific research.

Yup. Not to mention the group has hired multiple convicted child predators in the past and now doesn’t publicize its staffing or board at all. I understand the need to destigmatize pedophilia so people can get help before they offend (and this researcher’s work may indeed help with that) but I find it SUPER shady that…

So interesting that this platform is being used to promote the work of the Prostasia Foundation, which seems to be on quite the media blitz lately. But I’ll leave it at that.

I don’t know who he is (stopped watching WWE in high school so my points of reference are the Rock and Steve Austin lol) but these suits are fucking fabulous!

Tall fugly white comedy dudes always get a weird amount of love here, see: Pete Davidson dick discourse.

This is a rhetorical question, right?

If she’s there to promote a film, reporters shouldn’t even be addressing her personal life. Just say “no comment, I’m here to talk about the movie” if you don’t want to add fuel the fire. Now every reporter she meets on the press junket is going to bring it up in hopes of getting another soundbite from her for dumb…

Right. While I appreciate the pay disparity is frustrating, my main takeaway is that both Kirsten Dunst and Toby Maguire were way overpaid for these shitty movies.

I had to Google that one and damn, Bronson is out here dragging everybody.

Thank you. It feels like the researcher is using her study to justify the existence of fanfiction, which...doesn’t seem necessary? Lots of people have sexual fantasies that are icky or downright revolting to others, and I think it’s fine if they explore them safely through fiction. What’s weird to me is trying to…