yeah but the last election was effective. If you don’t see the irony in being disappointed about getting a nuanced story rather than what you thought was being advertised-overtly entertaining and incriminating evidence that would make the whole political consciousness thing a lot easier- then how are you any different…

I guess this is just a matter of preference? I can’t really get frustrated as long as I feel like there was quality news relevant to the topic. She didn’t say she had the most obviously incriminating tax return. But it is really weird that the one she got is this tiny, vague document from 2005. If all of his other…

“she felt it was important enough to get people to watch her show and learn about his taxes. i’m ok with a little click bait if it turns out that more people are informed if they watch;” YES!!!!!!

how hard was it for you to watch it?? It sounds like you get the gist of what happened and are literally just complaining about a pre-amble that you didn’t find suitable for the content. Unless you’re her EP, I do not understand your issue as a media consumer. You had no wool pulled over your eyes. you understand what…

What’s wrong with designing your ads to get people susceptible to “bombshell media” to watch non-bombshell media that treats an issue as complex? IMO it seems like people expected rachel maddow to get him impeached. they’re mad bc she tried to get people to watch her show??

It tells us that for someone who supposedly has totally normal and cool and not at all suspicious tax returns, he makes a really big deal out of withholding them. It could be because he’s a narcissist who loves the attention he gets from being withholding, but it could also be that what was sent to her was meant to…

It sucks that people feel like it’s ok to violate a woman or man in this way, regardless of the double standard, it’s still really depraved.

for sure!!! I think her Tommy ads are perfect, but yeah, seeing her try to compete with lesser-known models who have better walks and better expressions at various FW shows makes the commercial appeal so much clearer too.

haha that makes sense. I just like, really dislike her as a comedic actress. Even her facial choices in this are just lazy, borderline offensive even?

yes.!!!!!!!!!!!

notice how Scarjo literally has 0 lines in this sketch? GRETCHEN, please stop trying to make “ScarJo is a fun person” happen. It’s not going to happen! She is a good actress who is not fun.

wow i love you

Here’s the way I see it: a trans woman is a woman. Thus, her experiences-regardless of how she presents initially- are that of a woman’s. Why do people try to make this harder on trans women, they already have to go through so much damn BS. I seriously do not get anyone’s stakes in the game against trans women. GTFO…

not even gonna read this you know exactly what happened

this is sooooo judgy and back-handed body-shaming! Jesus christ girl if you want to be a 4, someone else can be one too. If you’re not a 4, and she is, you have to deal with it.

L.O.L.

um, it kind of sounds like you hate your kids anyways, so why would you take them somewhere they’d have their needs as prioritized as yours??

with you 100; clearly with the women’s strike and CIA hacking leaks Jez had nothing else going on yesterday and someone had to draw the “asshole of the day” stick and write this garbage article. Any haters here (towards you) are literally as bored/uncreative as the author of the piece! Good luck!!

Nothing will convince me that ScarJo can be a fun person!! If you fuck up Joss Whedon, are boring AF on SNL, then you’re just not a fun person. That’s ok, though! It’s just next to all of the other ladies who can clearly be fun, she seems EXTRA not-fun.

WOOOWWWW does that look annoying!