So did you get paid for this actual review since the original author didn’t do his job the first time?

This type of writing is why Gawker filed bankruptcy. I won’t be sad when Jalopnik doesn’t find a new home after the restructure.

Diesel is cheaper than 87 here in Ohio. Also, I’m glad Mazda is holding off on turbos because that means the cars will be that much more reliable used. Plus, turbos are only more efficient depending on your driving style, but many people with them aren’t seeing better economy than they’d get without.

I have a non-turbo FC and the engine has been the most reliable part of the car. Much of the running gear is new and/or aftermarket now anyway so all those worn 1991 parts were a good excuse to upgrade. Unfortunately the body and frame are going to shit because I can’t afford bare-metal bodywork but if it lasts until…

Mazda has a way with proving points. I believe they are the most solid engineering company on the market right now. They’re trying to do things that actually matter without gimmicks. While everybody else was slanging turbos, Mazda came out with the little 4 cylinder that only made 155 horsepower and wrapped it in a…

I’ve been seeing these things regularly at TRC for over a year now. Last year they were in camo. This year they aren’t. The only difference I can tell is that they’ve gotten louder since last year. Besides that, *they’re still not on sale*.

The front wing of both Indy Cars and F1 cars are in ground effect. All “ground effect” means is that a feature of the car is designed to compress air between itself and the ground. It’s literally the effect of the ground being in close proximity to a surface.

In Enzo Ferrari’s defense, the concept of fluid dynamics was still pretty shit back in his day. It’s still pretty shit now, actually. You ever tried modelling an oil system? Jesus Christ.

What kind of Citation? There’s at least...ten of them.

Also should be comfortable betting against that Gawker lawsuit.

And it looks better, too.

She’s not cute though. If her reaction to this is being terrified and focusing on nothing more than oncoming traffic, rather than being cautious and situationally aware, she probably shouldn’t be driving at all. Lots of things happen very quickly while driving and we all know it’s probably the most dangerous thing…

Poorly engineered aluminum wheels are well known to break. Well engineered wheels are not known to fail at all without some unusual impact. The Fifteen52s you posted are a weird example because those hit a wall, but they’re also lazily engineered.

I very highly doubt the RE-71R is capable of more traction than the R888. That wheel didn’t fail because of high lateral load, it failed because it was shit. A manufacturing defect most likely. I still have an old RPF1 of mine that smacked against a wall at 100 mph that is still generally in one piece despite some…

I’m glad you shared this. I went to their website, and according to their news, posted today, they just released the production design for the car’s interior. Progress is being made.

And neither wearing a bike to look good nor mastering the bike have anything to do with acting morally, or even following the law, which are the things in question during this confrontation. So as far as I can tell, you’re just nitpicking because you don’t like people who ride bikes to feel the wind in their hair. If…

Thank you for being reasonable. If somebody else wants to go fast, let them. If they mess up, it’s their fault. If you get involved, then suddenly it is also your fault.

Speeding isn’t dangerous in and of itself.

I thought it was the editor’s job to scan for spelling mistakes and shitty grammar before an article gets published? What is this new era of editing we live in, where the line between editors and authors is so blurry? You must be in a hurry to fire off as many articles as possible before Gawker goes bankrupt.

Ah yes, the sound of understeer.