The kid had a right shoulder issue. That fucks up all shots. If his shoulder is back to 100% he should be back to being an elite player.
Brodka
Brodka
OK. But what if Sean has a roommate who was home?
Sure, but it’s weird to say “I stopped by Sean’s house but They wasn’t there.”
Why do I lose if I’m the first to build a snowman?
Why do we do this? Why do we (both sides, all sides) seek to impugn the arguments of the other side by misrepresenting their motives?
I didn’t say upset. I said surprised, but be that as it may, this is a semantic argument about where you draw the line on what a ‘sandwich’ is. If it’s any combination of meat and bread, yes, it covers many things. Sushi, Dumplings, Burritos, Gyros, Burgers, Pierogis, and yes, Hot Dogs. Except none of those things are…
It’s simple. Suppose we went to a sandwich place for lunch yesterday.
It’s like you have no idea how cooperation works. In order to get the benefits of the deal, you typically have to testify about everything you know. You can’t lie.
He’s like social science Bill Nye. He’s not a researcher. He communicates the work of researchers. Every one of his books is based on studies done by other people. That’s not a bad thing. He credits the study and it’s authors and then puts the study and related studies into a readable form.
A “hanging judge” is not a racist judge. They are a harsh judge.
I just gave you advantages of virtual currency.
Counterpoint,
The letting capitalism take its course book was written by a guy named Karl.
“I haven’t played the game.”
I don’t believe they are unwanted.
What I don’t get is this stupid website (which otherwise does a really shitty job covering sports games) posting article after article about this game that I enjoy.
And everything in 2k can be unlocked by simply playing the game.
This is bullshit. I play 2k20. I will not put in a single dollar beyond the purchase price.
That’s fair. But I think there’s a subtle difference between moral choices making the game hard and having immoral choices make the game easier.