Indeed. (“Very” is a nonsensical response to my comment)

Slavery IS violence. Escaping slavery is self defense. I never said I was against self defense.

Yes, and this here is entirely my point when I say that you are providing so little substance.

The French weren’t non-violent. God, what are you, 20? The French just got beat. They had an impenetrable line across the German and Swiss border. So the Germans took the lowlands to the North and came down to Paris all but unopposed. The English and French got their asses handed to them. The German air superiority…

This is so dumb. The 19th Century was the century where humanity learned that non-violence is better than violence. Violence accelerated the Nazis. It justified their methods.

I don’t care whether you think it a good example or not. I didn’t cherry pick. I just chose the most recent progressive win.

face slap.

Um,

Or worse, you become the most brutal guys.  Either way, you lose.

Some of us learn from history. Some of don’t and are doomed to repeat it.

Sigh.

No it doesn’t.

Butt hurt over my side (liberal/left/whatever) casually justifying increasing levels of violence. Yes.

And I’m saying that’s dumb.

Most likely?

Another shitty argument. No one says something has to be the worst type of something to be shitty.

But that’s a shitty argument and you know it.

So little substance.  

And yet, you can’t respond to virtually any of my positions with anything approaching a rational argument. Weird, right?

Facepalm.gif