Is it me, or is random kissing not still inappropriate?

Chocolate - awesome.

I've got one of the 505s, and I've still not found anything that will convince me to upgrade. It's got a set of physical buttons that are actually useful, and the ability to read epubs is just too handy to give up.

Just watched it. It's brilliant. The joke's repetitive, but good slapstick can be.

Well, the problem is, while the camera is running, the person holding it is cueing the dogs to behave in a particular way. It's remarkably hard to get dogs to perform very precisely while filming them. You really need three hands.

Cross post this to Jezebel. Go on. I dare you.

Maybe that's great. But it's almost certainly going to be about the watered down, crap version of Constantine. Which they're cancelling the main Hellblazer for. It's a fucking tragedy.

What's there to say? Older white men tend to vote republican? It's hardly a shocking discovery. I'm more interested in an analysis of the validity of their data. It's based on exit polls, but misses at least a quarter of the states. How valid are exit polls as predictors of results?

Easily the best of the bunch. Remarkable really, given the minimal effort.

Eh, can't say it did all that much for me. A nice idea, but a bit oversentimental. Rather surprised it won all of those.

Android was playing.

Way overpriced.

I'm working on the principle of a deterministic universe, where everything is governed by the physical laws. If there's no separation of the mind/soul from the brain, your brain is fully controlled by the underlying physics of the universe. In that case, your choices and emotions are decided prior even to your birth,…

You hoping this "article" will be retweeted then?

Then where do you want him to get his ethical code?

If you assume free will, then the choice of how to respond to an unexpected or unwanted pregnancy is yours. It doesn't matter how the spark came about, it's still you choosing how to respond. The argument then goes that god instituted the spark that way because he knew how you would respond. You've still chosen, he…

A hell of a lot of justifications we have for things come from "imaginary" things.

You're evidently still in the anti-theist part of the atheism arc, so I'll just reiterate. I don't believe in god, but understand that here, he was making a point that was separate from scientific theory, and as such, doesn't really have a place in the article. That's all I was saying.

Dunno. Don't believe in god. If I did, I'd probably argue that that was the result of man's will, while the pregnancies themselves were the result of god's will.

I'm not saying his belief is replacing science. My original point in the post was simply that his comment didn't have anything to do with science.