@Benjamin Temple: 0.1%
BritishAcademic
BritishAcademic
@99TelepodProblems: I'm not sure if it translates, but it was demonstrated that masturbation helped reduce the risk of prostate cancer. Assuming that this is due to the usual link of masturbation to the process of ejaculation, you could make the argument that homosexual anal sex or pegging (NB: not giving an…
I'm rather fond of the references. Ah, the good old unbiased media!
I don't understand why eveyone feels the need for a "right" answer to whether or not it was a dream. The aim was to produce a degree of ambiguity, and this allows you to choose your own ending. I picked it not being a dream at last, as that in my mind resulted in a nicer story. But if you think it's a better story if…
@midnightz: Hers looks rather brigther. I wouldn't be surprised if it was platinum, which you don't really get thick rings of any more. His is most likely some gold alloy.
Sorry, but these were loads better. Open-ended, much greater in scope, and allowed you a wide choice of characters. Though they weren't quite CYOA any more. They were more of a single player D+D, akin to the old single player T+T modules. Shame they only made 6 of the 12, but there's some talk of the series being…
As a guy who doesn't iron, why on earth are you writing an article about an iron? I mean, is there an internal pool, on who does each article? Why is there the desire for an article about an iron? Where does the basic concept of doing an article on an iron come from? Were you just sent an iron?
@Jason Chen: Does it not seem slightly wrong though? By using the star system, you've created a system in which it is to your benefit to gain a star, and used the inherent desire of human beings to chase after things that elevate them over others to make people invest in the star system, and then you have entirely…
@Jason Chen: and are you going to enforce any sort of neutrality in this starring system? I don't think I'm the only one to think that the system of starring is incredibly arbitrary, and depends entirely on how whimsical the writer of a particular post is feeling. On the opposite side, stars seem to frequently be…
@philibuster: Note: do it somewhere so that you're not going to provide a source of ignition. Also, don't turn on the lights.
Sorry, but this is the only Spider-Man musical I need.
Making a phone call on that is a bit of a knotty problem, as the voice recognition doesn't work properly. You have to really bark out the names of people you want to phone. Still, it's nice to see companies turning over a new leaf, and branching out into new areas of technology, while staying close to their roots of…
There's really a hell of a lot of tags now. Is it still really a workable system? Do we need to collect all the trollish comments in one place? For what purpose?
Oh hey, a new Casper!
@Follower46: Don't know, never been one. It would certainly be a step in the right direction if they could, though I still think a multiple flag system would work best, with a required minimum number of users making a comment.
@Follower46: You could only follow all the trollers if someone was prepared to go through and edit every comment.
I'd be interested in seeing more into the moderation side of commenting. I've occasionally seen responses to comments that range from peevishness to fawning, with people destarred because they disagreed with the writer, or starred because of a simple "you rock/this article rocks" comment. While it may be ego-pleasing…
@halfbaked: 6 billion people in the word. Nothing you think is unique.