Brianorca
Brianorca
Brianorca

EU-28 emissions for 2019 may show a slight decrease from 2018. The total world emissions are expected to increase. Emissions tallies take a while to become official so we really won’t know for several months to a year.

EU-28 is on the right track emissions reduction wise. And after Brexit, it’s Bob’s your uncle for EU-27.

Guess we know who watches The Watchmen.

I mean, it might be that they are required by TSA policy to go through the whole speech as a liability thing, protection from lawsuits sorta thing. Just in general, if the drones are doing a thing that seems pointless and annoying for everyone involved, it’s because their bosses have threatened to fire them if they

They often do build them for efficiency. Take the Model S Long Range, for example. It gets 373 miles per charge out of a 100 kWh battery (basically the same size as the Taycan’s). You don’t get Ludicrous mode with that car. If you want Ludicrous mode you need to move over to the Model S Performance which gets only 326

Maybe Taycan owners should get a turbo tattooed on each arm:

But then you’d have to upgrade the fuel injectors, fuel pump, shafts, rods, valves, sleeves, etc. to handle the extra power.

So fix the power grid then.

Assuming it stays in liquid form, it shouldn’t be flammable. It only ignites in the presence of an oxidizer.  Good news is it doesn’t cause rust.

So really no different than transporting gasoline.

You’re talking to somebody who predicted Tesla would fail imminently in September 2018.

also important to note that the model 3 long range got 455 miles of range on the CARB. so it really isn’t a great metric to rely on.

I understand the idea behind designing for purely efficiency, but it’s the performance modes that attract buyers who are willing to pay. Those buyers subsidize the research and development of more obtainable models for the masses. So in fact, the manufacturers simultaneously can be serious about GHG emissions and

Too much lag. You would lose some of that initial torque.

Couldn’t Porsche just install a larger turbo to increase the range?

Either way, would the legal fees end up being less than $20K?

In the complete absurdity of this whole thing what got me the most was:

I’d probably take Giz’s ‘sincere concerns for our privacy’ a lot more seriously if it wasn’t for the 18-20 different trackers embedded in every one of their web pages. (Including ones for Amazon’s ad system, ironically enough!)

I would request a meeting with their legal advisory and at that meeting inquire the exact laws that are being used to claim this right. If you were given these items freely they are yours to dispose of at will unless you are advertising as a vendor for them specifically. Do not say anything, only ask questions, do not

If these were promotional CD's sent to you by companies (and you didn't specificly ask them to send them to you), then it doesn't matter what the they say on them or what their lawyers say. The law is on your side. Unsolicited mail is considered a gift.