Boxer_4
Boxer_4
Boxer_4

I disagree. I have the base model Impreza 2.0. CVT. It’s a great car. Drive it light, and I’ve seen some astonishingly high fuel economy numbers on the highway - WAY in excess of EPA ratings. The CVT doesn’t motorboat like other makers units do. and it handles like a go-kart. The PZEV rating for the engine is nice,

If we’re talking about brand new vehicles under $20k, then it has to be the Subaru Impreza. For the money it’s the most fun, has really good fuel economy and is extremely safe. It offers fairly basic entertainment items but does include bluetooth connectivity for hands-free phone use and music listening. There are

Seems incredibly inefficient to expect all traffic to utilize only 1/3 of the road.

Supposedly, a five-speed installation is a reasonable proposition.

Your local cheerleaders are different than the ones where I live...

This is why some systems should stay mechanical instead of going electrical.

Hey the 2000 LGT wagon had the 2.5L with 165hp and was quick compared to my first Subaru wagon a 95 LS with 2.2L 135hp auto. But yes I loved that car and its still alive abit barely any body left.

Dude, leave space. Simple driving/riding lesson here... You’re acting like a complete tool posting this.

If you were cut off twice in a half a block what would make more sense?

In pretty much every car I’ve driven that has either daytime running lights or gauges that illuminate even when the lights are off, the “Jellyfish about to kiss” light means any lights other than the running lights are on. This light comes on whether you’re using the parking lamps or the headlights. Example:

I’ll just leave this here, the complete CBS Radio broadcast day of June 6 1944. The first news reports of the invasion came from German Government Radio Broadcasts

EJ25 baby! Found in damn near every Subaru model line (save for the Tribeca and BRZ) until the current gen’s 2.0 f-series. Slap some extra goodies on it and you get the STi’s EJ257.

Just bought a 2015 Outback. It is pretty big. It’s an inch longer than our outgoing Volvo XC90 (190” compared to 189”) but 3” narrower than the Volvo. The craziest thing that I find is that my 2002 Honda Accord is 189” as well and only 2” narrower than the Outback. So it’s not like the Outback is massive. I don’t find

I can play this game too! This Isuzu 117 Coupe was my favorite sight in Kyoto, though technically I found this at a hotel by Lake Biwa.

I live quite close to this spot and have driven the road several times. It was actually not a very dangerous spot, quite easy high-speed kink, but the surface got unexpectedly soft. Some cars coming before had close calls and because of that most of the spectators backed off, even though they were in the correct

Cord 810/812

Yeah, our 2.5 2015 Outback is actually pretty peppy of the line. Now of course it falls off, but it’s not as bad as people make it seem.

The 2.5 CVT isn’t bad off the line. From 50-80 isn’t great, but from a dead stop it pulls just fine.

sending the Subaru soaring

I forgot about the ridiculous brightwork going across the trunk lid. WTF was Chevy thinking when they decided to do this to ALL their cars?