BookWrangler
BookWrangler
BookWrangler

If "she appeared to consent and didn't flee" were valid excuses, we wouldn't have statutory rape. But just like when a 30-year-old man has sex with a 15-year-old girl who says she wants it, we consider it to be wrong, to be rape, because they aren't on the same mental level. She's not mature enough for the law to be

Hi, I'm Malcom Brenner. You might remember me from some sealife fetish films such as Dolphin Lover, Blowfish, and Blowfish 2...

Shouldn't that be 'Fishandry'?

I think that's reductionistic—he's not saying women are as dumb as animals, he's saying animals are as sentient as women. It's sick that he's using that as a reasoning to rape animals (he needs therapy, methinks), but it's not necessarily degrading to women.

THAT WAS ALSO AN EPISODE OF LAW AND ORDER SVU, FYI

this is seriously shit. non-human animals CANNOT CONSENT TO SEXUAL ACTS.

(A relative of mine married into a family of horsefuckers. She fucked a guy who fucked horses, whose father before him fucked horses, and so on. This is not one of the strangest things about my family)

What the fuck did I just read??

I had a conversation about something like this a while back, focusing on whether or not "consent" from an animal would be meaningful. For example, a human being who doesn't yet or can't understand sex/sexuality can perform sexual actions, like rubbing their genitals on someone, but that's not consent for actual

NOW IS NOT THE TIME, KASH.

Just because the dolphin tolerated it due to being in heat doesn't mean it was consensual or that he's not completely and utterly disgusting beyond all ability to adequately express it.

I don't know...I'm not that well educated about dolphins, but I think I actually agree with this being a case of there is very little chance (though still a chance) that one could actually rape a dolphin.

Oh so it's fine for Helena Bonham Carter to get naked with a fish, but not for this guy to bone a dolphin? I see how it is!

"But zoophilia draws on the desire to elicit consent nonverbally from the animal, as much as a person can."

LETS GET FISHICAL, FISHICAL

I'm so goddamn torn... On one hand, Dragon's Dogma wound up catching my eye early, and I've been a big supporter since it released and became one of my personal favorite games of all time. On the other hand, ONLINE NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

I've been needing more Dragon's Dogma in my life for a hell of a long time now, so I'm totally on board with this! As long as they can recreate the fluid combat and continue with the fantastic music (more awesome Japanese intros please) I'll play the shit out of this game.

Only concern I would have is frame rate, if

Yes. Why not just expand the story and landscape and beef up the monster count and the graphics? Who the hell asked for online component? Kills the fun and idea of pawn system, which is very fun and clever tool more developers should use just like the nemesis system from Shadow of Mordor. It's ideas like these that

While the original game had some online elements – namely the Pawn system where players could share NPC versions of their characters – a fully online version was actually contrary to the initial concept of the game. " Dragon's Dogma was made with the concept of 'enjoying with a mild hint of connectivity' during a time