Diana was already sort of taken by Citröen

Other princess names that Nissan could crib:

If you’re standing with your back to the bar...

Another innovation on the Chiron. 2D printed lights for lower weight.

Yes, but really, there is nobody around hating on trucks for using solid rear axles. Not even the ‘eurosnobs’.

Have fun crashing over every single bump in the road with your car that ‘is faster than an M3 around Laguna Seca’.

...or anyone else valuing decent ride?

I’d like to think there is at least a divider between the cyclepath and the footpath? Cyclists and pedestrians don’t mix. The relative speed difference is almost as much as between cyclists and cars. Also, pedestrians are very unpredictable for cyclists.

It’s not in Delft, it’s in Eindhoven. It was designed in Delft. Because when stuff in Eindhoven gets too complicated for them, they turn to Delft.

wood is quite an expensive material as it needs to go through several machining steps and several finishing steps before it is an actual product. Plastic for instance is much eassier. Just one injectin molding machine and you’re good to go. Aluminum same way. Cheap pieceof pipe and use the injection molding machine…

Make a Lambo SUV version of that to outcrazy Bentley, retain Lamborghini credibility and find a different niche than corporate stablemate Bentley.

Somebody at Jaguar Land Rover told me that they don’t believe the Bentley Bentayga can do 187 mph because their people couldn’t push theRange Rover Sport SVR anywhere close to that, despite its weight advantage and 550 horses.

So you come up to people and ask them if they know their electric car is charged using coal-fired plants.

Classic campsite activity among dutch students. Works best if you let the oil get really hot, and add a closed beer can tonthe container. The beer can sinks, and when it pops it needs less energy to boil resulting in bigger fire balls.

Newtons second law greatly complicates things in this case, as the second law assumes the source of the force can keep up in terms of power. It’s much more applicable to a constant-thrust engine such as a jet engine. You could do all sorts of complicated math starting from newtons second law to derive an acceleration…

The problem is not complicated at all. The nice thing from an energy point of view is that you also get the time into your equations. So you bring your problem into the real world. The energy equation is easily expanded to take into account driveline loss, aerodynamic drag and a power curve.

Nope, you’re just digging your own hole deeper.

I’d wager the kink is there mainly for the beam axle rear end.

There needs to be a scintillation term in there as well, but I’m a bit rusty on these matters so I’m not sure. Let’s hope Ultraman will enlighten us a bit more.

Nope, you’re not derivating math well enough to apply the torque force correctly. You should listen more to Ultramans ultrawisdom.