The Alfa Spider has all your boxes ticked. It also ticked the ‘all aluminium engine’ and ‘individual throttle bodies’ boxes.

The Alfa Spider was a much more expensive car in the day.

The front tire picture showed that the front tire is 285 section. The rear tire is at least as wide. Yet the rest of the car makes this look much narrower. This thing is absolutely humongous.

Apparently the gearbox is a bit crap for street use as well.

Superautomatic machines are notorious for mold buildup.

Counterpoint: Most real drivers’ cars are only appreciated in retrospect.

In its timeframe, the DS Familiale came close to perfection. Every parameter of car performance has a negative down side. A very well-handling car is probably not very comfortable and won’t traverse adverse terrain well. Very pretty cars are frequently not very roomy inside. A very large car won’t be practical to use…

Same goes for the Countach

What jenever are we talking about and how much do they want for it? Usually Ketel 1 is considered one of the better mainstream jonge jenevers, and here in the netherlands it runs around 15 euros for a litre. As for oude jenever, one of the best mainstream oude jenevers is Rutte oude 12. Around 25 euros for 0.7L

HEAR HEAR!

If its performance was on the same level as the Quattro, then that’s tough shit, the Peugeot 205T16 made mincemeat out of the Quattro shortly after its introduction.

The RS200 never won anything meanigful and it shouldn’t even be mentioned in the same sentence as the Quattro or Delta Integrale.

Sadly, a large part of this article is completely wrong, especially all the stuff about hiking.

TWO CITROEN SM’s IN ONE GARAGE!

I still don’t think the demise of the flat-four was justified. The flat four is wide and needs two cilinder heads but the returns are numerous:

There are more Ghia cars.

It’s not like there are no other big luxury sedans that are FWD based...

Humblebragging doesn’t work. It’s been proven by Science.

You’re thinking too much for your own good. The uhlenhaut coupe is a road going 300 SLR. Of course it’s not the same car as the one that burned to a crisp in 1955. I’m just saying that it is in poor taste for Mercedes to go with ‘fire’ as imagery in conjuction with a 300 SLR. That’s it. I don’t care about your boner.…

can you read or are you just incredibly dense? If the latter, let me explain so even you can understand: