Blakkar
Blakkar
Blakkar

That really comes down to suspension setup and geometry. There is still some perception that Tesla’s are basically slapped together and rely on the Motors and AWD setups, of acceleration and speed. That tire squall is all the indication that the car can not handle all that well.

My bad.

Read your link again, the car is $39,900

Not really a surprise. The C7 ZR1 weighs at least 600lbs less. Has a lower profile to the wind so once up and going encounters much less wind resistence or drag. Has almost as much horsepower. and is by default just a faster car....

It is a tank not sports car and he has to do 25+ things at once NOT associated with driving. Of course, it’s not going to be stick.

You really have no idea how conversations work do you?

Who aside for five year olds, “girlie-girls”, “girlie-men””,and the terminally immature uses the word “yucky”? If your definition of “immature” allows you to skirt this then you really need to grow up more than a little.

None of them. The word “yucky is pretty much the most subjective and immature term, in the discussion of automobiles, I have ever seen. Worse you did NOTHING to justify the use of that term. The word it so nebulous you HAVE to go in detail. Throwing it out that lazily like that is just... stupid.

The C3 was the second weakest, but engine output. The C4 reacted the most readily to MORE power slightly more so than the C2. And none of the Vettes were ”yucky”(A more subjective and immature term to use, in a discussion of automobiles, I could never imagine).

Nope.

And this is what happens when you elect a wealthy person, who has NEVER wanted for anything in their entire lives, in charge of a country whose resources he has been told is really for the rich and the poor don’t matter and lives in a “Zero Sum” world (which this is not anymore by the way).

1) Modified engines tend to be “unicorns”. There was no production flat plane crank LT5.

1) It was a modified engine from the original condition. This is not unheard of. Do not even pretend it is.

The rear faces of vehicles are usually very limited in design because so little goes on back there. RMR sports cars tend to have such overtly designed rears because there is so much that goes on back there. On top of aero and taillights, combustion exhaust, there is also thermal exhaust from the engine. So the grill

So why is GM trying to make the Corvette a rear mid-engine again?

The ATS is actually slightly smaller than the Chevy Cruze. The ATS does NOT need to be any smaller. Just pointing that out.

GM HQ NEEDS to let Cadillac be its own animal. Tryinbg to “keep” Cadillac in the family is what is killing Cadillac. Caddy should be taking off like rocket but because it has to be conscious of the rest of GM, it is always held back.

So you nabbed a set piece from Black Panther. Okay.

Not good enough. When you still need to pay for the roads you drive on. Those do not last forever, you know. Call me being fair minded, but if Everyone else has to pay road tax, that would make the EV driver a thief. Converting a ICE-V to a BEV to avoid paying maybe $100 in road tax is a total waste of time and

The GC was designer from the beginning to be a higher grade off-road vehicle similar to a Land Rover. Maybe more so given the demise of the defender. The Hellcat engine is just the engine. Given and modernized, all-new, Charger or Challenger platform, it would be extremely hard to call the Hellcat a “monster” on the