Yeah fair enough. But I think financially they would most be interested in advertising with popular brands.

It makes sense for them to want a piece of that pie. I don’t think they’ll be able to get similar scale though, considering how Fortnite is much more well suited for all ages and audiences, Warzone is still a “realistic” shooter so not everyone would want to puts ads in it.

Yeah that’s fair enough, but I still think that if used correctly gloves can be beneficial, or at least won’t hurt. I guess making everyone wear them and only having like 20% do it right would be rather useless.

I don’t see much wrong with that. Me and my gf do that, and we simply wash everything we touch while in gloves, meaning keys and door knob, as well as phones.

How is it any different from turning the phone off?

I didn’t you call you that, it’s your own name lmao. Anyway I get it now, you’re just trolling. Please, by all means keep that up. I ain’t got any more time though so bye

It wasn’t even an insult lol, just a joke. Insults are what you are doing. What’s your problem anyway?

Username checks out

Reaching Chapter 3 takes like 3-4 hours though, so I’m not sure what your point is here.

Um, sorry, no? Any grown adult with a job can buy their own, they are dirt cheap these days even with 4K. May have to skip the bar a few times though I guess?

Depends on what you want from a TV I guess. I love me some new tech, so even my 2 year old TV feels kinda dated, and I want to get a larger one with OLED and Dolby Vision. If you are okay with the same tech for 8+ years, that’s fine I guess, but many people want improved stuff when it’s available. Hell, 1080p wasn’t…

Well, they are dropping support for some 2010 and 2011 models, that’s 8 years of use, I’d say more than enough for a TV. Besides, you can always buy a smart device like Chromecast or Roku or a console to provide even better service that will still work with the older TV.

The point is, all those games DID launch with MP mode. Will be weird af for them to kill it completely here, after supporting Factions for many years.

My opinion is that she should have ended things way before marriage, or at the very, very least, not get married for crying out loud. If she chose to go through with it, expecting anything to change DAYS after is irrational. Obviously she was expecting to continue being with him if she vowed to spend their life…

If he was acting this way leading up to the marriage, it should have been cancelled or postponed. Or did she expect him to change a few days later because “it’s a honeymoon phase”? I just don’t follow the logic here.

Moving out or taking a break, fine. But I don’t think complete breakup and divorce after 4 days of marriage is fine unless something drastically changed/escalated, which it didn’t apparently.

Do tell me about a single case when screaming caused death?

We also only know one side of the story, and I know people who can start crying during a tiniest argument, without any yelling or anything, so who knows.

That last part is my main problem with this. Why marry a guy with such red flags, and then expect things to magically get better in 4 days when their overall situation didn’t get better? Either the guy was always an asshole and not worth her time, or the problems they are facing haven’t been resolved yet and she needs…

Because people handle tough situations very differently.