I agree with this. But I don't agree with your assumption that Paterno let him continue because he knew what was really going on. That's my whole problem with all of this. That jump to some conclusion that Paterno was as evil as Sandusky. Like they had some pact to rape children. The most likely scenario is that…

Another person misconstruing facts. And again, someone who just wants to bash someone to make themselves feel better. Sandusky perpetrated the crime, Sandusky hurt those children. But never never in any of these stories is his name brought up. It's all Paterno's fault because that's the name that draws clinks.

Problem is that he didn't cover up anything. Get your facts straight.

It's easier to hate than to try to understand isn't it? But then again, understanding what actually happened and realizing that Joe Paterno is a tragic figure rather than a villain would steal your sense of superiority......and we can't have that now can we?

Should go well with that old 3D monitor.

So someone tells him about what's going on and he refuses to believe it. That's being stubborn and blind. "Nope fuck those kids, I'm protecting my friend". That's what you're implying that he did right? It's just easier for people to just say he's a bad person rather than make a complex exercise in empathy and to…

When you realize that Joe Paterno never did anything to hurt any of those kids, you can finally see that the tragedy was the institutional failure of Penn State, their attempt to cover it up, the lies some people will tell themselves about the actions of those close to them, and our willingness to punish those who…

Of all the NFL rules, this is one of the most clear and one of the easiest to rule on (due to reply). You seriously should start with the pass interference rules that's making the NFL damn near unwatchable.

Somewhere deep inside all the people who saw this as a catch, is the root of religion, birtherism, and any other delusional train of thought.

It doesn't matter what either of us "saw". It's what the referee saw.

Oh so detesting the Cosboys makes your take more legit? If you watched ANY football over the past 3 years you would have know right away that wouldn't be ruled a catch. It's one of the most consistent rules they call.

That was not a catch and a football move. That whole process was THE catch. It became incomplete once the ball popped out. Get over it. Karma's a bitch.

Is this your first time watching a football game?

I can see many others called BS on this list of yours. SO I won't repeat them. But I would ask for you to submit proof that some of these things are "myths". Especially the rear wheel drive "myth" and the Not warming up your car "myth". I know for a fact that rear wheel drive cars are much harder to control in…

This guy needs to be kicked out of the league. This is pathological behavior.

I disagree with this. Why over complicate things? I mean it doesn't matter how you break down player performance into points. There will always be randomness that screws over someone. I can live with losing both of my championship games because Rodgers choked in the Bills game.

The Giants need to sweep in and make him their D-Coordinator.

Couldn't Gordon file a grievance vs. the team over this? Isn't it in the collective bargaining agreement that players can't be willfully held out by the team to avoid meeting contract escalators?

They have a point....a very very good point. Think of the money they make on subscription costs alone. You'd think they would provide you with a robust network for your money. But they don't because they know that most people will blame the hackers once word gets out that it's them.

And for those of you crying about…

"Ok so they put the RACCOON SKIT on but not the second ONE DIRECTION skit like @nbcsnl reevaluate your priorities"