Badprenup11
Badprenup
Badprenup11

There's a simple fix at least, well as simple as such a feature can get anyways. Just two toggles for cosmetics, one that controls whether you see your own gear and one that controls if you see the gear others wear. In PVP you always see the gear that other players are actually wearing. 

As much as I’m not going to mourn the loss of what was easily and consistently the worst comic featured here, it does look kind of barren to be continued as a feature. 

If not, I'm sure we'll see a "original radio stations" mod within a week of release, playing whack-a-mole with Rockstar's legal team

What's your reasoning for this particular line of thinking? I'm interested, because I don't know why they would feel that way. 

Yeah there are definitely solid reasons as to why physical copies have advantages, but they absolutely don’t apply to this.

Sneakerheads are just fucking weird lol. All the weird descriptions and opinions on clothing as the high fashion scene, but devoted solely to the article of clothing used to keep you safe from stepping on broken glass or in dog shit.

Absolutely no Pokémon game has artificial difficulty so severe that even a 6 year old can’t pick it up and play it to completion. Pokémon was “Baby’s First RPG” back in 1998 with Red and Blue and has only gotten easier since.

Or you know, the disc degrades or gets damaged or you lose it or the disc reader breaks or any other number of things that can happen to damage a physical disc.

I think it will go exactly how they want. Either a bunch of yelling and they get to say “well we tried to get their feedback but their vitriol and threats just didn’t lead to anything constructive” or they can just say “oh yeah we hear you”, do the bare minimum, and paint themselves as good guys.

I mean that's all Turtle Rock really seems to be doing now. Just desperately trying to recapture the magic of L4D. Still haven't managed it even after a decade. 

Right? My 9 year old nephew loves Mario and loves Lego (he has a playroom filled with thousands of them, mostly hand-me-downs from his dad), and he won’t touch the Mario sets with a 10 ft pole. I’ll just quote him directly since he put my feelings into words so well:

I like this. I’m not the biggest fan of how combat felt in SV, there were lots of ways it felt sloppy and underdeveloped. But it was still fun enough as a mechanic that is more or less optional unless you really want to 100% the game, there was still plenty of other content to engage with while not fighting.

“Clever" 

“Clever" 

I had never seen the remake but I figured they would have to get the car in some manner like that to justify it. I was thinking like winning it in a race from others but wrecking their previous car in the process. 

I think there is a line that divides "things that require additional clarification" and "things that are completely obvious" and this particular nitpick is deep into the latter of those two. 

He knows exactly what to do with his free time. This. 

I’m torn on this. As said, he clearly wasn’t an endorsement for the symbol, he was an idiot and a fuckup. So it seems unnecessary to remove it. I find it different compared to like Dukes of Hazzard, where the main characters are supposed to be likeable heroes but their car has a half dozen pro-confederacy aspects to

*In order to receive this free game you must sign up for Nintendo Switch Online Expansion Pack+ Plus, which also gives you access to Jak and Daxter and costs 120 dollars per year. 

What is weird here? 

I mean in SV it does frame the monsters as hostile and that they are an infestation in the places they spawn. We don't have context on this game though.