You know, people give white Americans shit about not having a real culture but... I’m not the one getting extremely mad about a digital hat so maybe I’m okay with that.
You know, people give white Americans shit about not having a real culture but... I’m not the one getting extremely mad about a digital hat so maybe I’m okay with that.
Hell I thought it was just an oversized version of one of those hats the pilgrims supposedly wore. Turns out, round flat brimmed hats have existed in multiple spots throughout history, who would've thunk?
Yeah but knowing Nintendo, probably as a Duplo set.
Lately? They (and by that I mean every single blog in this network) have been "hot take" central for as long as I have had an account. But I guess you're right that it has been even worse lately. I would have to guess views have been down.
I’ve never even heard of this until now.
Oh I love Kevin James. But there's no denying that nearly anything he is acting in is a really safe comedy.
Exactly. He does the most boring, safe comedy that you can do. He's like Kevin James or Ray Romano, just the poster boy of executives in a board meeting saying "Let's play it safe."
Is it worth equal self reflection on your part when you realize you are replying to people solely to call them pedantic on a site where people regularly “nerd out” and get into long debates about inconsequential things purely for entertainment’s sake?
Hell. Just make a new face using AI to combine all past Bond actors. Otherwise you still risk likeness licensing issues
...What? No. I’m not huge into Dr. Who but isn’t the given explanation that it’s all the same Time Lord and they just change over time due to various circumstances (in real world terms, to justify the actor change)?
I think that’s a good way to handle it. While the face of the current Bond may be a good selling point (idk why but for some it is), this will save a lot of cash in licensing and keep the game from being in some kind of likeness licensing hell like Goldeneye or Nightfire are stuck in.
I mean maybe? If anything it's more worth an article, that Capcom is still 'hiding' something that is weird to hide and isn't even secret anymore.
You could have just said that exactly as you did just now (and as other people were able to say more succinctly than that) and it wouldn't have made people think you're an idiot, followed by them thinking you're a twat.
I’m shocked that Rockstar hasn’t released an HD Remake collection of at least the PS2 GTA games, plus maybe the two Stories games as well.
Oh $9.5 million huh? I guess their CEOs are shaking in their boots, knowing that they are going to have to reroute 5% of their annual travel and meal budget to pay these fines.
Honestly it sounds more like “I like Wario and want to make a post about him but it needs more of an angle” than actually making a real stance on capitalism and greed.
Shameful to not read the inclusion criteria
“Me and my friends liked it, therefore you must be wrong and you need to leave Pokémon alone until you change your mind.”
Sure but the problem with the Score Attack aspect of Snap was once you figure out the 4-5 secret things you can do for really good pictures on each stage it’s mostly just repeating those things and mashing the picture button hoping you meet the hidden background mechanics to eke out another couple points.
If it's similar in content to the original I would say it isn't. It was cool but it was also easy to 100% in a weekend.