Badprenup11
Badprenup
Badprenup11

I've wondered the same thing myself. I'm involved in a few online communities, mostly game related and I've come across a few furries in the past. I have also wondered why the single predominant art style is that "How to Draw Cartoon Characters" book for sale at your local Scholastic book fair circa 1997.

Thank you, I don’t need a video for something that can be said in 20 seconds.

Geese, swans, and turkeys are some of the biggest assholes of all birds found on US soil. I also have a hatred for pheasant, because they are dumb as shit and will hide in ditches, get scared when a car approaches, and instead of flying in any other direction will slam directly into the car and die. I’ve cracked two

Fuck I hope not. The original versions were way grindier and lacked a lot of QOL stuff we take for granted now. Hopefully they are based on the SNES version which is all around the superior versions in terms of graphics, gameplay, and audio. 

I mean, I don’t know if you were right or not, but can we still scoff at you because you’re acting like a self-righteous twat?

I think you mean the realist in you.

I was actually going to comment she looks like one of those high quality life size sex dolls, but not quite as realistic looking. 

I’ve seen it and while I’m usually not picky about art style, something about the one they chose really bothers me. It seems like an okay game though.

Well I assume it is run a few hours at a time across months and months. So it is more organizing times to run the game around your life, rather than vice versa. 

I probably need both hands and feet for my list but that is about it. I typically either play a game for only a few hours (enough to beat the story) or go in for 100s of hours, with little in between. I wind up playing a bunch of games for very short periods of time and only a few that get up to 100+ in my 25ish years

That is some dedication. I can rarely dedicate 100 hours to a new game I really like before wanting to move on, let alone having 100 hours only be 1/3 of a game I assume they have run several times.

Well why would you need big name games recommended to you? You read Kotaku, so it can reasonably be assumed you consume other game news as well, correct?

My one concern is that while I know ConcernedApe is working on a new content patch, that after he stops developing Stardew we’ll have another decade-long drought of mediocre or non-existent farming sim/RPGs

I mean he definitely did some shitty things, so expect a bunch of comments disagreeing with your opinion of him. I don’t know if he has actually grown up at all and if the apologies and actions he has taken since doing those things makes up for them.

Yeah I see this as a failing on three parts:

Yeah I responded to someone else saying Greedfall was probably a poor choice for comparison for a bunch of stuff besides what you mention.

Lol if it makes you feel better, we're tight on cash so we can't afford to buy it until the inevitable GoTY version comes out. 

Sure, maybe Greedfall was a bad example, but you can compare the clicks to tons of other articles and Sims content just doesn’t get as much action as other content. It isn’t an insult or a bad thing, it is just a fact. Personally I agree with what others have said that most of the Sims fanbase probably just don’t

Well aside from the mom and pop stores that are extremely few and far between (they might even get more business if local Gamestops near then close), I would assume used sales are going to move almost entirely online. Ebay, Craigslist, maybe Amazon too?

I definitely found it a more solid game, mechanically. I didn't feel like the different hunter abilities meshed well together like they did in the first game though.