I love the fountain. It's the film cloud atlas wishes it could have been.
BRSanders
BRSanders
At last, they had found the perfect robot to explore the ice-capped seas of Jupiter's moon Europa.
We've shown you impressive anamorphic illusions in the past, but the work of Felice Varini brings the medium to an…
By Charlie Jane Anders and Katharine Trendacosta. Netflix is a crapshoot. Your local movie theater is a garbage…
Christian Rex van Minnen paints his subjects in a very classic style of European portraiture, but makes the subjects…
To call Kelly Thompson’s The Girl Who Would Be King a simple superhero novel would be to do it a disservice. To call…
Remember in the first movie when it was FUCKING BLACK! UNACCEPTABLE.
I've had issue with the story/loved it so much it's a bit unhealthy because it perpetuates the idea that a woman can change a man. "If I just love him enough he'll turn from a beast into a loving husband." That trick does not generally work out so well for either parties. That being said, I'll watch any story with…
We all knew that bullet vibrators could result in — ahem — pyrotechnics, but we didn't know they could be used to…
this is completely unnecessary. that being said I nominate alison brie for belle.
Now playing
Yes, ladies and clones, The Venture Bros. is really coming back! Adult Swim has finally confirmed the date when we…
Now playing
In Patrick Smith's multi-award-winning animated short film Masks, a race of sadistic masked men chow down on a…
There appears to be good news — Random House has made some big changes to the contracts it offers for its e-book…
When you stare at images of the cosmos, do you ever search for shapes and faces amidst the swirling clouds of dust? C…
This looks more like Aubrey Beardsley to me.
Hogan McLaughlin is an artist and fashion designer with a particular passion for A Song of Ice and Fire—especially…
You're confused about feminism, period. WTF is wrong with you?
I'm not going to defend the quality of the writing, but (a) the language in the passage comes more from gender studies than from literary studies, and (b) highfalutin-sounding terms like "embodied being" and "marked bodies" have specific technical meanings for this in-crowd.
Why is it that shop talk among social scientists and those in the humanities is regarded as "stilted and pretentious" while shop talk among scientists and engineers is regarded as incomprehensible but really, really smart? Insider-talk always sounds funny to outsiders; don't assume it's nonsense just because you don't…
Actually it's neither. Humanities scholars are just more comfortable reading stuff in its intended register, and are also more well read so they are more comfortable with allusiveness as an approach to information density.