Better lighting/shadows as well as better materials. Look at the glass cases on the left - the original has reflections from the room baked into the render.
Better lighting/shadows as well as better materials. Look at the glass cases on the left - the original has reflections from the room baked into the render.
I’d rather watch the story of survivor’s guilt, TBH.
God dammit now you’ve made another one.
The CGI is worse then the movies. Atleast for those they had a movies budget
It was horrible
I skipped the second and third movies as the CG was really off-putting in the first one. I honestly had no idea that they were sticking with this style for the TV series and I’m immediately bummed out by it. I’ll give it a shot since I’ve always wanted to see the rest of the story, but man what a disappointment.
Nobody cares about your stupid boner.
Just a suggestion but could we get Amazon links to each of these when articles like this are put up in the future? Saves some time from googling them all individually, and I know io9 can get some affiliate cash that way too.
The ‘nobody would care’ argument is moot because the game on its own merits would be master crafted just like every game Valve has ever produced.
Yeah, that’s not what trigger warnings are for, and it’s not how they’re used in academia. I’d recommend reading this if you want to know what you’re actually arguing about.
Except not, because they actually did trademark the word “react” http://www.tmfile.com/mark/?q=866893…
The more attention this thing gets the more dirt on The Fine Bros seem to appear.
The ability to know things that the commanders at the time did not and could not is an entire layer of meta-gaming when it’s used to break history in these sorts of games.
You want them to do extra spoiler warnings for morning spoilers for the next 4 years?
Don’t forget that part of the critique is that the scientific gain may be dubious; if true, you have a bit of a false dichotomy in that we aren’t really choosing between 8 monkeys and innumerable humans.
Kind of reminds me of the story of the suitcase man that was promoted when I worked at the Horseshoe casino. They tell the story of how some guy comes in with a suitcase with $777,000 plays one bet and wins. They even run a promotional the same time of year when he made that bet what they don't tell you is that he…
But how are they supposed to attack your statement if they can’t redefine the terms they use?
Twuto?
I saw the pilot at Comic-Con, and as much as I liked Ellis as Lucifer, he couldn’t save a bad show. And what I keep coming back to is the way it treated women. Murder victim, gold digger, sex-crazed psychiatrist (that scene went on about 5 minutes after it stopped being funny), and an actress-turned-cop who everybody…
Probably. Reminds me of a recent FCC thing where Hannibal had tons of bloody dead corpses, and the FCC didn’t like that some butt cracks were visible. The solution? Add more blood to obscure the butts.