You forgot to mention patricia hernandez rape culture stories, boobs in game? rape culture, not enough chicks in new games show in e3? big ass unfair treatment of women in video games industry, big asses in wildstar? rape culture.

Kotaku, ladies and gentlemen... ever relentless in it's holy ordained mission to take clickbait to new and astoundingly sad levels of horror and pointlessness that no one ever remotely asked for. Bless your adorable little heart, Ashcraft. No one in the history of human existence is quite so adept at exploring and…

I'm a fan of anime, and I don't use...

It makes sense for people whose hobbies are attacked and vilified to speak out. This is not something so shocking.

>they were housing someone who made his intention to murder innocent women pretty clear

Yet you did comment with a condescending tone as though you're too high up on your pedestal to understand why anybody would care about such nonsense, yes?

Why the fuck do you curse at people over their TV habits?

I find the entire school of thought in this article troubling. Primarily, the entitlement that it assumes. It's the assumption that because you are a fan of "Show A" and you talk online a whole bunch about "Show A", that the creators of "Show A" should listen to, and change their product based upon your comments.…

He was not found guilty. We are hearing one side of the story, his identity should be protected as stringently as hers unless convicted. I understand that his innocence would make him a statistical outlier, but I don't think we can simply assume guilt, false accusations can also damage.

Why should you?

Hey friend, I know you're not imaginary, so suggestion of violent reprisal for an offender does not help the progressive cause.

Lindy also filters out the comments that don't agree with her, so there's that.

WHY!? WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? YOU DON'T KNOW ANY OF THOSE PEOPLE. WHAT IS YOUR CRITERIA!? AMERICA, GET A GODDAMN GRIP ALREADY.

I don't think they should block someone from TV just because they are ignorant. If anything this should be used as a moment to have a discussion about race and sexuality and closed-mindedness and stuff. You shouldn't just be trying to make people who have stupid views go away.

Her and Kelly are both trash talking assholes.

Shorter version: some self-identified feminists really like to use buzzwords without considering their meaning.

If they're not worth responding to, why are you responding to them at all?

I hate to give this idiot any credit, but I have to agree on one point: Looking up someone's post history as a response to a debate is fucking bad form, and childish. It's one step above stalking. Respond to the argument being made in THIS THREAD, and none other.

You mean when girls act like they are objects, creepy guys will treat them as such?

Yes, becuase male victims of domestic violence is so funny. Because obviously men's feelings, mens rights, and when men are hurt by inequality, it doesn't matter.