Hmm, alright then. Same developer, I assume? No new or changed writers or anything?

Before I get to the proper reply, I want to thank you for being the first person to discuss all of this with me. I’ve tried checking into things at the Undertale subreddit, but it appears challenging to actually start a conversation there without some kind of in-game reference/joke that derails the conversation. Also,…

I completely get what you’re saying regarding OFF. From everything I’ve seen, it was really going for the “we’re so kooky” vibe; I am willing to believe that the translation from French to English may have had some impact on the context of everything.

I really need to get around to playing LISA. But I have such a hard time deciding between all of these crazy indie Game-Maker-esque (or, actually made in Game Maker, in most all, if not all, cases) games when it comes to what to play next. LISA (which I own but haven’t really gotten around to), OFF (which I’ve seen…

*potential SPOILERS for those who haven’t played/finished the game with various/multiple endings*

I think it’s more sensationalizing what Scott said about being unhappy with the response. And, granted, there were some valid reasons to remove the title and patch in a couple of things. Like I said, I haven’t played it, so I don’t know myself why so many sites say it’s bad. But after a couple hours of it, maybe I’ll…

I watched a good hour of gameplay (via MatPat’s GT Live channel) and, personally, didn’t see anything so jarring that it would stop me from playing it (though I’m honestly a terrible critic; unless something really grabs at me as being awful, I usually just let it slide). And at the current price of free, I really…

While I have yet to play this myself, I don’t understand why almost EVERY FNAF World article headline I see on multiple sites says the game is bad. Considering the reviews on Steam when it was first released, it was still, for the most part, being received fairly well. And even Scott himself said that while the…

Then is it just meant to be artsy for the sake of art? Because even as art, it’s got so much of an out-there mindset that even people with generally accepting views of all kinds of art and expression seem to see this kind of stuff as bizarre or confusing. Like, I love me some weird art and out-of-the-box ideas, but…

Starred solely for your Tingle support. <3

Hey Bashcraft, quick correction to the article: amiibo didn’t launch in July 2014. They launched in November 2014, but were announced at E3 that year (June).

Their humor feels very similar to these prank channels I see all over the place now. Difference is, my understanding is that Mega64 made their name on actual pranks, acting ridiculous in public without any actors or prior consent, but without it being sexual or physically invasive. I still remember getting some old…

That would be fair if it weren’t for the ridiculous level of highly-subscribed prank channels out there. Like, Mega64 made their name off of messing around in public, and, to my knowledge, it was all real (though I could be wrong, as I’ve never really looked into the specifics of their material that closely). It’s…

Mega64, Critikal, and Film Cow all have amazing reactions to this announcement. Can’t get enough of the reactions from other YouTubers.

Oooohhhh, so THAT’S what happened to SuperTramp. I kept hearing something had happened, but hadn’t seen any news about it. Well shit, that’s just bogus. =/

To his credit, Kotaku has this weird history of headlines that imply spoilers while giving no direct spoiler warnings, yet also placing spoiler warnings on articles that really spoil next to nothing at all. So, there is some validity to wanting a spoiler warning that’s more direct.

Oh no, not foul language. What ever shall I do?

I’m only patronizing because you’re acting like an asshole. You get what you give.

Yeah, it sucks that there are shitty people that act hypocritically. Welcome to the human race. =/

But just because instances exist where cut content is not shown, doesn’t mean there aren’t instances where cut content is readily available. Like, I get your points here, I do. But it’s not realistically fair to say my differentiation is invalid just because other instances exist that don’t fit said differentiation.…