No. We read the NDAs [non-disclosure agreements] that we sign closely. So do our lawyers. Then, learning from past experiences and not wanting to deprive readers of news, we also talk to the companies we signed the NDAs with when leaks like this happen.

I just wish David Cage would stop acting like a pompous asshole in thinking that basic fundamentals like missions and game over screens are "out-dated".

The real danger with this is forgetting about your actual surroundings and fapping in front of an open window...and possibly falling through the window naked.

Once we get Oculus Rift porn, half of the internet users will disappear.

Here's a complete list of flaws with this remake, if the trailer is to be trusted (who am I kidding, never really trust the trailers):

1. So we have Murphy's family fully established as characters BEFORE the birth of RoboCop? This eliminates the mystery and mythos and emotion from Murphy's roots. Why do this?
2. Murphy…

The first major fuck up I detect.
He look like a guy in a suit.
It's not supposed to be a suit.

Looks absolutely generic, safe, and pitiful compared to the original.

This just looks like generic action movie number one million. How many people where shot and killed in this trailer versus the entire first film? How much less bad ass is a submachine gun to the "this thing will put a hole through your chest" gun of the original? Why did they need to make him emo-black?

It was an apathy joke, not a rape joke. They could've inserted any kind of terrible event in place of rape and the joke would've worked. Observe.

I'll never undestand that. **How** can you read that comic and see a joke aimed at rape victims? Do you just assume the man wants to hurt people in his comics? A mistake, maybe, but the *initial* comic was never intended to mock or hurt. For me, it was always about the absurdity of a creature called a dickwolf. People…

Very disappointing choice of words in the article. In no way was the Dickwolves thing a "rape joke". Rape was not made light of, nor were rape victims. The whole point of rape in that strip was to depict a horrific scenario - which I think everyone can agree rape is.

Looks like my money will be added, at a later date.

From what I read, everyone was disappointed they didn't do more with it, and felt it was too much like the NES game... which is weird, because that was the point. It was supposed to be a remastered version of the NES game

Ya know...at least he's honest?

You're not funny.

On the bright side, this should only effect less than 1% of the world's gaming population.

Pro Tip: If you're older than 21, choke down your contemptuous knee-jerk reaction long enough to watch the video. You'll see the democratization of film in action. With some very interesting experiments in short-form narrative.

And if you miss the rush of dopamine you get from acting like an elitist jag-off, you…

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO…

He isn't god of the game. He gets to offer rejectable input on the most worthless part of the game, micro-transactions, and gets a small part of the money his ideas pull in.

The best thing about this game is that Molyneux has decided to be realistic and stop over-selling his ideas.