Vet slips, gun falls on the ground, safe goes off, gun shoots and hits a truck with flammable materials passing by, truck explodes near a retirement home: mass killing of elderlies.
Vet slips, gun falls on the ground, safe goes off, gun shoots and hits a truck with flammable materials passing by, truck explodes near a retirement home: mass killing of elderlies.
I commend you for your well thought and level headed posts, we'd need much more guys like you on both sides of the argument. I really can't debate about the whole police can't be everywhere, etc; not living there, I must take your words as truth.
I can't do that, there are no ranges which rent firearms in miles here.
Hmm... more safe? The kind of comical situation you depict has an even lower chance of happening, like in the femtos.
I'm not saying guns are the only problem, you're completely right on that, drugs, culture in general, there are many factors but I do think guns are quite an integral part of it.
I've never touched a gun in my life, so I wouldn't know. Correct me if I'm wrong. But I guess that obtaining and operating a gun is way easier than creating a bomb. Especially for someone who's not very sharp.
I guess, it's just that we live in two different worlds: there SHOULDN'T be a need for self-defense and vigilantes. People shouldn't be celebrated for killing or hurting others, even if it's to save people.
A) Not having a gun easily, they could get descouraged, or rethink about what thery're doing.
Right, we should swim in a firearms pool then, it's the safest thing around, as long as nobody pulls a trigger.
Yes we do, in part, at least here in Europe. That's why we have laws stating maximum levels of alcohol in blood for who drives.
Then all that marvelous work reaches Europe and is litterally shitted on by the new local translation. Most of the times, if I can, I try to change the language to English, as I can't stand my local translation.
I'd really like to have a report button for stuff like this. You're not that good of a troll though.
Let's see, since you talked as if you were a connoisseur of FF, I didn't really think I had to break it down for you. Also, saying I didn't state facts is really something coming from you, you said FF-FFIII were bad, without adding any reason whatsoever.
I see what you mean, but Four Swords Adventures says hi. Actually THAT would have been a much more logical choice, lots of people couldn't play it in co-op due to the GBA connectivity, now the Wii-U has what basically is a GBA with a touch screen as a controller. That would've been hella logical.
He didn't praise VII over the others. He just praised VII over XIII. Also your retort is lacking, just saying "your opinion is questionable because you praise a game", why don't you state some facts or at least some reason for what you say?
Watch the series which started last year, it covers part 1 and 2 of the manga, 26 episodes. Then WAIT, they're gonna adapt part 3 soon, and judging by how well they adapted part 1 and 2, the new adaptation is gonna eclipse the previous versions.
Of course the passage from SD to HD creates quite a difference, but what I wanted to say is that out of all the possible choices for an HD remaster inside Nintendo's library of games, WW seemed to be the one game which absolutely needed it less.
You serious? It's $5 a year. You're gonna spend more than that TODAY. We're not talking of $100 monocles in EVE.
I don't understand why they decided to remaster WW in HD in the first place, if there's a game with graphics which 10 years from now will still awe players, it is definitely Wind Waker. Up until now it has held the test of time fabulously, still looks like an interactive cartoon.
Actually she's famous cosplayer Jessica Nigri. (yeah, I know you're joking)