Or better yet: comment and prove your displeasure, trying to discourage the editors from publishing something similar again, and in doing so help making Kotaku a better site.

Or bitch until it disappears.

Yes, Oda ripped off traditional japanese art.

But that's exactly what I'll do, I WON'T be supporting anyone who makes online mandatory or stops the used games market. I'll play PC and Wii U, I've never owned an Xbox in my life anyway, as for the PS4, if it goes the Microsoft way I'll drop it as well. However in the meantime I'll do my best to protect our rights…

I'm not saying, people shouldn't have fond memories attached to developers/publishers, I'm saying they should keep emotions out when talking business and anti-consumer practices. Companies don't let emotions get in the way when they decide on DRM and such.

Let's say it goes against some consumers only. So what, does that make it okay? Shouldn't we bitch then? Should we bend over? What makes it just a little tad difficult, is exactly people who's not affected and decides to defend the companies, for some unknown reasons, instead than the fellow consumers. My guess is…

He's also someone who tries to prove his points by stating he has an IQ of 155.

His whole argument revolves around:

You're totally right, I'm with you!

Except that the common pronounciation isn't Gif at all. Americans always forget there's a world outside theirs... Here where I live everybody call it Jif, anything else would be ridiculous due to the way we write down the G sounds in our language.

Okay, that was a little harsh, I'm just angered by his blindness to the situation, there was no gameplay shown today, only promises, promises, promises. I'm actually very open minded and reasonable, that's why I always give a chance to every system. I'm not a blind fanboy of Sony, Nintendo, Microsoft or Valve (or…

*sigh*

They don't really exist, as far as I'm concerned, until they show footage. As in GAMEPLAY footage. They showed NO GAMES today, only clips, CG stuff and cut-scenes.

True. Though now they do this, I'm ok with the ads, but not with keeping let's players from making any money.

Because Nintendo is a multinational which CONSTANTLY sees something come back: everytime they sell a system or game. Online passes, invasive DRMs, always online bullshit, in game advertising, anti-used game market behaviour, on disc/day one DLC, are all greedy and oft anti-consumer practices. The fact that…

1) Misoginy = hating women.

Rayman

Your retort makes no sense, you're just validating my point. You're not the judge of what is art and what isn't, nobody is, and being on television or in a book isn't anywhere near being a good criterium to choose what's art, that's why you can't arbitrary decide that something has to be censored and something hasn't.

And I in turn am pointing out that one is famous classical art and the other is semi-obscure contemporary art

Shitty games are allowed to be shitty. Though shitty games aren't allowed to disguise themselves as great games and then be shitty. That's a no no.