Do we want to know what this is?

Ah ok.

Why didn't you say "see: tongue in mouth second pic"?

Might have a chicken or egg problem with that claim - maybe female action leads don't become totally stacked meatheads because no one would really want them to, it's far from cultural ideal. There are certainly women out there who are like that, I'm not sure you can conclude from movie stars that it's actually…

I just asked for a citation for "most male actors of the action variety" are on something. You gave me one who is, is one == most?

Citation?

My guess is Hugh Jackman gets ripped before a movie role because that's his fucking job, full time for months before he even gets on set. You're the first person I've read who suggests he juiced.

Sure she would, what are you talking about? Are you just making shit up now to shore up your bigot bonafides, perhaps ahead of applying to be a Maricopa County deputy sheriff or a staffer at the national RNC?

Also, the guidelines you quote don't say "never refer to the pre-transition name of a transgender person." Gawker refers to her using her current name, but it also includes mention of her prior name. That doesn't violate the GLAAD guide at all.

It's kind of basic journalism that if you write a piece on a person who has had more than one name, you mention this fact and include the other name. It's not invalidating for her to have her former name mentioned in an article; I'm sure her identity is solid enough that just seeing her old name in print doesn't send…

Why would gender etc. count for actually measuring heartbeats? A heartbeat monitor isn't an estimate, it's a measure. It's the calories-burnt counter that's unreliable.

What are you talking about? She's going to have like $60k in taxes, if she could pay that "out of pocket" she wouldn't be freaking the fuck out about winning a car.

I mean, his name is Jaxxyn, so?

But what was she wearing? Maybe that was part of the problem. And why didn't she bother to charge her phone? Also, doesn't she know its dangerous to be out in a city alone that late? (/sarcasm)

Whoa the Saudi Arabian woman shook his hand, that could theoretically be as inflammatory as anything in the movie itself.

An "mmo" with 16-person combat instances, that's pretty one dimensional (all space fights)? I dunno, worth throwing under the bus imho. At least compared to high expectations for Star Wars content.

It's fairly broad, see here for the definition that applies to the DMCA.

In a regular conversation people use ISP often to refer to companies that provide internet connections, but in discussions in a legal context there is a much broader definition (which includes Google, Wikipedia, Gawker, etc.).

1) Why structured that way? My understanding is that the law doesn't intend for ISPs to act like courts - i.e. to review evidence and make a determination in the merit of the notice. They can review them for merit, but they don't have to, so virtually all large ISPs (like Google) have a presumption of legitimacy. The…

The reason the DMCA takedown process is structured that way is that it's the "string" attached to the safe harbor that service providers get from being sued directly for what users do with their service. (Safe harbor originally granted by the Communications Decency Act, a different law, and then extended to copyright…