I'm remembering now how lame the FC3 DLCs were. Very, very thin.

The Hurk missions are not part of the season pass. There was a SEPARATE code for the Hurk missions, that you should have gotten as a pre-orderer.

When you pre-ordered, there should have been a code for you to enter that unlocked the Hurk missions. They came during the game-play (an "H" on the map). There were three of them after the first meeting of Hurk, and they were all pretty fun (and funny).

The Hurk missions were a ton of fun. More DLC like that please (though maybe a bit lengthier to justify the extra cost).

No, they were very specific that the Season Pass covered the four story-based DLCs. Period.

We need Blood Dragon 2. We must have Blood Dragon 2. Blood Dragon 2 is a requirement!

I want what the "Bolt" offers in terms of all-electric range and driving.

Good to see competition heating up in this space.

I can't imagine what anyone actually liked about the game to be honest. It was frustrating. The controls sucked. And it was cut-scene heavy, with a shitty save system. And by cut-scene heavy, I seriously lost it when I was sitting there for ten fucking minutes while some cut scene played, after which I was prompted…

Red Dead Redemption was crap. Hated it. It was absolutely awful.

Maybe, but compared to the fun of the FarCry series so far (advanced LMGs, Snipers, C4, flight suits, buzzers, zip-lines, etc) I can't see trying to shoe-horn that franchise into a comparatively boring past of a western. Bleh.

I loathed Red Dead Redemption. And Far Cry has so little in common with that game (thank GOD), that it just strikes me as stupid to try and make Far Cry (which is all about amazing weapons and vehicles and stuff) fit into that mold. I just can't see it being anything but BORING. If people want a Western, they can…

While I agree with you on the over-done-ness of the other genres, I just can't see anything but BORING out of "Western". Of course, I hated Red Dead Redemption for a lot of reasons having little to do with the "Western" theme, but "Western" is just not "Far Cry". It would and could be some other series or even an…

I'm curious why you and others seem to think a Spaghetti Western version is "awesome"? Sounds dreadfully dull, and the opposite of Far Cry. All you'd have is a six-shooter and maybe a rifle. Explosives? A stick of dynamite. Transportation? You can walk, run, or ride a horse. BORING. You'd have to strip out…

The Alaska one could have us shooting unscrupulous big-oil corporate assholes. That'd be fun, with an environmental twist.

The problem with the Western genre is that the most advanced weapons are a six-shooter and a stick of dynamite, and the most advanced transport is... a horse. There's not a lot of fun to be mined there, at least based on all the things I loved about the Far Cry series. And yeah, I hated Red Dead Redemption and don't…

I'd dramatically prefer Vietnam to Spaghetti Western (with the most advanced weapon being a stick of dynamite and a six-shooter, it just wouldn't be very interesting). But neither is really on my list.

HUGE FarCry series fan, and I just finished Far Cry 4 (after putting 150 hours into it).

Far Cry 4 is seriously addictive. And there are several lessons I've learned from playing it:

I don't know why or how you never use it. It logs me in automatically, I use the voice commands all the time ("Xbox, watch HBO!"). No, I don't have any games that use it yet, but it's a central part of the system, and it's cool to just say "Xbox On" and sit down to play, or "Watch NBC" when I want to flip over to…