Shuttle and Space Stations have been using airlocks, and for a large vehicle or space station, it’s the preferred method, but the method they are using is in general concordance with how it was done in Gemini and Apollo.
Shuttle and Space Stations have been using airlocks, and for a large vehicle or space station, it’s the preferred method, but the method they are using is in general concordance with how it was done in Gemini and Apollo.
On the Apollo 8 mission, Bill Anders was damned if he was going to use the solid waste collection system, which consisted of taping a plastic bag to your backside, then assisting the fecal matter out with your hands, all while in a very confined space with your two crewmates. Between a “low residue” diet (foods like…
I’ve discussed how this is inaccurate elsewhere, but I heard an interview of the designer for the life support systems for SLS, and they talked about the contingency of needing to leave the astronauts in the spacesuit for several days to get home if they have an ECS failure or depressurization. One of the biggest…
Yeah, I think that’s probably the main reason their entire technical staff hasn’t left.
The reporting here is very inaccurate. Here’s a more accurate article. I also explain elsewhere in the comments how this is pretty similar to the procedures used in Gemini and Apollo missions.
The reporting here is very inaccurate. Here’s a more accurate article.
The reporting here is very inaccurate. Here’s a more accurate article.
Wait until you hear how they did this stuff in Apollo, only 100 times further away from the earth! This is being reported very poorly. Here’s much better reporting of the process that is going to be used.
It’s not two days in a spacesuit.
I’m as much of a Musk hater as the next rational human being, but there’s a lot being reported incorrectly here. The astronauts will not be in their suits for the whole, or even most of the 45 hours. They’re converting from a more-or-less sea level atmosphere of mostly nitrogen and some oxygen at sea level pressure to…
It’s not just numbers. Fewer R&S Mk IIIs were built (22 Mk IIIs and 5 Mk IIICs) than 333SPs (41), and a greater percentage of them were raced in IMSA or Le Mans. And, just picking a race (Daytona 24), R&S Mk III won 3 times, whereas the 333SP won only once. Racingsportscars.com lists 49 victories for the 333SP, and 46…
The 333SP surprised me. I’m sure you can pick up a Riley & Scott Mk III, a car that frequently beat it in head-to-head competition, for about a tenth as much. Of course, it doesn’t have a little prancey horse on it.
(Checks Google Maps) no lie detected. Strange. I’d think I-69 would lead directly to Climax.
That’s increasingly happening to me, too.
This is when I am thankful most of my tastes in music are not super popular.
Wait ‘til you see Intercourse, Pennsylvania.
I mean, it WAS a racecar.
Hacking around on the drums with some garage band, I think.
My favorite XKCD What If is the .9c baseball pitch. Of course, it has the relativistic kinetic energy of a small nuclear weapon.
First, the model rocket engine thing (black powder is about 80s Isp)