Astrix
Astrix
Astrix

I can totally see that when you're working with those logistics. As a male walking down the street if a single female walks up to me I'd generally count myself as lucky =) Of course my initial train of thought is that she needs the time or directions. Where-as with my club scenario, I was always by myself while being


Possible Spoiler

While I know I can't completely relate as a male, I have had situations where I felt hunted, or that I was a "target."

In my early 20's I did promotions for clubs and raves, one of the places that I spoke with talent managers was at a cliche named club called, "The Village." So while it was certainly flattering to

:)

Uhuh, next you're going to say you like David Bowie and that Labyrinth was a good movie.

There's the awful Lost Boys listed, that's more than enough ;)

I always figured Wolverine had such a big following due to when he became popular. He screams greasy pony tail, three wolf moon, metal band fanboy. He's the "cool lone wolf on his iron horse, smoking a cigar," because that's what was cool....in the 80's. He reaches out to the metal band nerds who still think wearing

See where you're confused is, my stance doesn't need to be debunked. You did that on your own. In judging people for judging other people, you have to assume you're working with the moral or ethical high ground. Which when you immediately revert to ad hominem replies, instead of articulating a point, you give up all

I'm sorry, are you judging people again?

And really, being pedantic over a typo? So much for any kind of high ground at all. Your obvious defensive and ad hominem response is specifically why those who take this kind of stance are rarely anything but hypocrites.

So it's wrong to judge people for their choices, yet you just judged people for judging other people. Meaning, you're wrong for judging them for judging people. How assinine of a position to take.



I would just like to say Thank You to those console players who are dealing with all of this bullshit, it will likely allow us PC gamers to have a smoother MP launch. You know, in addition to high res textures, modding, etc.

Cheers guys! :)

The problem with this premise is, that time line doesn't exist anymore so far as the current Trek story is concerned.

When the Star Trek universe was rebooted, they did so knowing that going forward they'd be working with a new timeline. It would be silly to try and have two different Star Trek franchises going at the

Watch at 35s in the water is falling straight down, and water is running off her chin, if you believe her hair isn't getting soaked through so be it.

Yes, but in this video she washes her hair with it in a tie, and proceeds to towel dry it still in the pony tail.

Agreed, $30 seems perfectly reasonable so long as it's a full expansion and not just a bloated DLC.

It's well done, but not surprising. 3D modeling always has an odd sheen to the lighting that's never quite right. The reflection on the eyes, lip gloss, or how evenly the old lady's skin is lit.

An anecdotal response that doesn't respond to the article or his comment. He's clearly stating that $30 is the standard, and the article is inferring that it's some how a "new high" that will prevent people from purchasing the expansion.

Agreed, this seems a bit sensationalized.

$30 for an expansion is expensive? I guess it all depends on how much content is provided.

Heart of the Swarm is STILL $30 for SC2.

We can increase clean energy all we want, but so long as we refuse to get on board with the cap limits shown above, or even attend the summits, we're still a major contributor. Hell, one of our two political parties wants to completely do away with the EPA stating that they are useless because there are no