Ok, say joe public gets just two, with a burrito and a drink. For a single meal of the day, and will very likely have fast food for other meals of the day.

It's not -A- taco that's the problem. It's that people order multiple tacos, a burrito, a drink, then put condiments on it for a single meal of the day. And may do this three to four times per day.

And loaded nachos come in at nearly 1400 minus a drink for a combo.

It's a single taco, you're not going to drive to taco bell for a single taco.

Calories don't matter? Huh? Wha? Of course calories matter, especially in obscene quantities. Because generally the source OF the calories is shit.

I am I'll admit it, but I also prefer to not eat it even if presented deep fried.

"So therefore you make a value judgement on the product over the consumer behavior?"

The loaded nachos are 1400 calories, a 5 dollar box is 1200 calories, most burritos land between 8-900 calories.

I don't believe I was stating anything about taste. Delicious or not, the individual asked what was horrible about them, I provided an answer.

"If you can manage to limit yourself to just one or two a month, there's absolutely nothing wrong with eating them. "

The better question is, does it matter if I've eaten one, OR what it tastes like when the nutritional facts are horrible.

Doritos Locos Taco:

Isn't the suicide rate in Alaska high enough already? Now they have to go introducing another cause of early death, morbid obesity?

You have yet to give a case to show they are true firstly. And my "nonsense" has contradicted each of your points.

Your point was that they couldn't make money. They do.

"You left that part of my argument out, that since olympians are not allowed to be paid for their sport you can't make a living doing it."

Track. Running in a circle over and over. Let's compare to your statement shall we?

=P

Appreciate the correction! They looked a lot alike prior to Val Kilmer bulking up for his new role as Jabba the Hutt.

Erm, that's the thing here. You're taking it as if linking it to the Nazi party instantly tarnishes it. When it should simply be viewed as a historical backdrop.