Ashoka
Ashoka
Ashoka

Yes, it was an OBJECTIVELY BAD movie. That’s why the three other people I went with, and myself, four people with completely different tastes in things, all loved it, and the entire theater cheered throughout.

“Objectively”

Snicker.

The more I see of this movie, the less I see of it really having anything to do with the Joker. The King of Comedy vibe is so strong here — down to the casting of De Niro — that I feel like this trailer could almost be sued for copyright infringement.

I just feel like this is really the wrong approach for this

Yes he is. Already confirmed he still working on those three movies. Please fill my salty tears cup 

I’ll admit, I had no intentions of seeing any movie that brings back McAvoy’s character. I feel like he’s just the latest addition to a long line of movies that demonize and misrepresent people with Disassociative Identity Disorder, making them out to be violent monsters who harbor secret, evil identities when in fact

And the saddest things of all is that it was that unique walk and other mannerisms of Jar Jar that people so often accused of being racist... and they had no idea that they were in fact created by Best himself, with no input from Lucas. I remember him talking about how he had these various voices and characters that

He should have, but I can see why he didn’t. People were mostly attacking Jar Jar, not Best personally, like they are doing now with Tran for example.

I can only speak for myself, but the past couple of years have opened my eyes to just how toxic and harmful entitled fans not getting their way can be. I was a major hater of the prequels (though never to the extreme that the current wave of toxic fans are), but everything the new crew is having to deal with made me

I finally watched it and more reasons to drag it:

Reasons I dragged this episode:

“Wah, I didn’t like a movie and this is a personal slight against me!”

What does this have to do with anything in this article?

Every time I see someone quote “Let the past die” I know instantly that that person did not understand the full context of the movie. There are 3 separate paths in the movie that are presented, by luke, kylo, and rey. One is to let the past die, one is to be trapped by it, and one is to remember it and learn from it

This article wasn’t about the quality of the movie, it was about the injection of politics and bots into the criticism of the movie. But thanks for playing.

But seriously, read the talkbacks on any major film site and you will see the majority of people who created this opening stayed home because of how they character assasinated Luke in TLJ.

“I just got all our bombers blown up through disobeying orders. Of course I’m still in the loop. There are more orders I could disobey!”

“She didn’t stop me from making my mistakes, so they must actually be her mistakes. I mean, why should I have obeyed her? Because of her rank? Pfffff....”

It makes WHERE her parents are important to her, not WHO they are. Their identities as a part of the larger Galaxy are irrelevant to Rey herself. It’s something the audience wants to know about, not the character.

Yes, and it makes her character even better. She’s awesome because of what she does and the content of her character, not because of ancestry.

JJ Abrams did have a different plan for Rey’s parentage: Plan A was to ask the question and let someone else figure out what it was supposed to be. Plan B was that her parents were Khan.