Arkadian
Arkadian
Arkadian

Interesting! I’ve never considered that young women should be forced to endure demeaning behavior just because they might have a rich family! I guess human rights really are conditional!

Considering these fellas prefaced their comments with "not to be sexist," I think they were well aware that they were about to say something that could be interpreted as sexist.

Multiple things can intersect and be true at once if you consider the history at play here.

Yeah, I’m self-aware enough to realize that I’m reasonably smart, at least in the upper quintile, advanced degree, etc., and everything in this article just totally lost me.

But it did remind me of Chidi seeing the Time Knife in The Good Place, so it wasn’t for naught.

X-com?  Elon has a 15 percent chance to hit.  Misses!

And I think you do that because you built this argument purely to defend a movie you like, and cast people who don’t like it as unreasonable, rather than out of a genuine interest for audience reaction and myth-making theory.”

That doesn’t mean that it wasn’t playtested. I guarantee every single issue players are encountering has been extensively reported on by QA testers throughout the process, with many of these issues likely being in reports for months, if not nearly a year.

I couldn’t help but think of this:

This is such an unhinged response. Yes, person who unironically used the term “simp”, I’m insinuating that you got some crushed up InfoWars Super Male Vitality powder under your nose. WTF does Disney have to do with anything here? And before you answer, take a deep breath and let the two wolves inside you settle down.

That “Spiderman will remain a Sonly exclusive” has that “and Dr. Beckett never made it home” energy from the final episode of Quantum Leap.

So this is something we’re supposed to get upset over? That someone we don’t know didn’t invite a bunch of people we don’t know to a party we weren’t invited to and has nothing to do with us? Sounds like it was a great party lacking people who might see it more as a way to make connections and get employment than a

What the f*ck is the point of this article? The author writes like a butt-hurt tween.

when Chapek said the quiet part out loud about “we know we have a great product so we’re going to charge more for it” I audibly groaned, and not just because I am a Disney slave LOL, but you don’t say that shit out loud as the CEO of a company with such a strong family-associated brand, even if you have to lie about

Mike, I cannot stress this enough: nobody likes you. 

If you are using the term snowflake like that, my ass you are a progressive anything in any areas. If you have to lie to make your point, your point probably isn’t worth making to begin with.

IT’S MINE I SAID STOP WATCHING IT

This was pretty standard 10-15 years ago. Back then QA was in a different building from the other game devs. We would enter bugs and it would go to either a QA lead for approval or a dev bucket to get assigned. If they couldn’t repro the bug, they would grab the QA person who reported the issue and take them to the

When Kotaku asked about which features were broken as a result of poor scheduling, a developer replied: “Tongue in cheek: the whole game. In general, every major bug in 76 [that appeared at launch] was known by QA.”

You know my theory on The Flash?