ArcticBill
ArcticBill
ArcticBill

So now I have to avoid black semen. What has the world come to?

I doubt your preference means little in a place like Liberia for avoiding unwanted semen.

You always plead not guilty. It is a matter of process. It allows time for hammering out the right charges and establish plea deals. Given the police initially lay the charges, often time they are not the legally correct ones.

Remember the hilarious Budweiser lawsuit filed by a dude who sued for $100,000,000.00 because after "using lots of their product, bikini-clad women did not suddenly appear and want to have sex with him"?

...Well that's why there is a destination for everyone I suppose. If severed human heads is your thing, try Syria. If you like your weed, Amsterdam, Montevideo or Kingston may be your best bet. On the other hand, if you fancy sheep or goats in a mini-skirt, you'll have to change your reservations from Copenhagen to

Cabbies are the universal source for scoring dope or other low-level clandestine commerce. You will overpay, but it is the lowest risk. When I was in Belize, I overpaid for my fix (blow) only for the first month or so; after that I was able to scope out the source and pay local prices.

The role of the union is twofold: first, in a general sense, to ensure the workplace is safe and harassment-free; and second, specifically, to ensure its members receive fair representation, especially in disciplinary proceedings. The first objective cannot serve to undermine an individual employee's right to due

In fairness to men, many of the examples cited in this piece could be from unreasonable inferences or outright misinterpretations. I know many women who believe every male she comes across is "hitting on" her, "stalking her" or "wants to rape" her.

Money grab? This hysterical attention seeker went around telling everyone and their dog this guy was a "serial rapist." Correct me if I am wrong, but he was cleared and was never criminally charged. He is, therefore, presumed innocent. This is clear defamation and I hope he wins.

They are! Just YouTube "public masturbation." Lots of hilarious videos of dudes caught masturbating in public (and even some in private) lol

How about cameras which can see through clothing? I remembering having one when I was in high school. It is by no means like in the movies, but it is pretty effective. Any law on that?

Agreed. Placing the onus on the individual rather than having a ban is an absurd argument that they are not bigots. The same "womyn" would likely not support such an argument in other contexts. For example, the right to remain silent during the reciting of the Lord's Prayer would not likely be a sufficient

I am calling buillshit. This sounds like some fabrication on the part of disgruntled taxi unions. By all accounts the woman was hysterical and a $12k CC bill is an obvious technical error which would clearly be reversed, if it ever existed in the first place.

How about the Safe Haven Law for men? Men should not be stuck into accepting parental responsibilities either. Interestingly enough when a man offs his entire family, the discussion is around the method of his execution, not "safe haven laws."

The issue with this survey is it clumped mere flirtation and comments with actual harassment such as physical contact, lewd comments and indecent exposure. Given the very liberal definition of "sexual harassment", the survey would likely yield the same result if conducted on men. What man hasn't received an

This is where the feminist over-zealousness in narrowing the legal concept of consent clashes with the right of the disabled to offer consent. When I was institutionalized, I was the volunteer patient advocate and a case came up which, while not like this one, certainly is relevant. There were two patients, one with a

This is where the feminist over-zealousness in narrowing the legal concept of consent clashes with the right of the disabled to offer consent. When I was institutionalized, I was the volunteer patient advocate and a case came up which, while not like this one, certainly is relevant. There were two patients, one with a

This is where the feminist over-zealousness in narrowing the legal concept of consent clashes with the right of the disabled to offer consent. When I was institutionalized, I was the volunteer patient advocate and a case came up which, while not like this one, certainly is relevant. There were two patients, one with a

Sounds like social engineering. Entertainment is fuelled by demand. At the end of the day, entertainment is a business not some politically correct exercise in social justice. If the masses enjoyed women-centred plots, there is no reason to doubt Hollywood would be there to meet that demand. That is simple economics.

Having a female leader is not a litmus test for the status of women. Would you rather live in Rwanda, Liberia or India?