ArcticBill
ArcticBill
ArcticBill

I have lived all over the Americas and have to say sex tourism by either gender is sleazy. I have lost count the number of times I had to help dumbass tourists get to their respective consulates because they got taken by local hustlers. If you come from a first world country and go to a popular sex tourist

Of course it is a totally different conversation when we are talking about embarrassing photos of women on the internet. Your love for ease of sharing embarrassing photographs is seemingly absent in that context.

Meh, a first world problem. Reminds me of the lesbian couple who sued a bar and comedian over "hurt feelings" and walked away with close to $35k. There were multiple instances of lesbian couples suing various obviously religious lodges/venues for being "shocked" to find out they would not host their wedding reception.

I love the picture. Usually it is the ginger who steals your soul and walks all over you!! That is how it was with my ex!!!

The transsexuals have it worse than anyone in the GBLT community because they are ostracized by all sides. There are a fair number of lesbians who loath transwomen. It is common enough to have generated am impressive pile of jurisprudence, mostly lesbians fighting against transwomen accessing various women-only

Ironically women's groups supported retaining the ban on polygamy on grounds that is supposedly leads to exploitation of young girls (as though we didn't have laws against marrying children?!?!). It only stands to reason that she should be charged. If men face prosecution for polygamy, fairness requires that women

It isn't more absurd than other areas of family law which MRAs legitimately complain about. Everything in a child custody/support case is in "the best interest of the child." Therefore there are plenty of cases where men are forced to pay child support even after finding out they are not the biological father.

In fairness, the stats for "rape" are overstated. Take Catherine Mackinnon's outrageous claim that 80+ percent of all women experienced "sexual violence." If you dissect the methodology used, the definition of "sexual violence" ranges from "inappropriate sexual comments about one's body" to full-blown forced

Leave it to the lesbian to "make a statement." There is a reason for all this backlash over GLBT rights in the US. Canada and Europe have more progressive laws. However, there are cases in both jurisdictions of lesbians going out of their way to pick a fight to "make a statement." Seems to me both places are big

Sorry, but it is what it is; if you are going to levy one of the most serious crimes we have in society, there should be hoops to jump through. We should have scrutiny over bald accusations given almost all rapes happen in private. Even with forensic evidence, there is still the issue of consent. Unlike being caught

I don't see why false accusers shouldn't be punished. During law school we debated that at length given the Duke Lacrosse fiasco was going on. Prosecutors and courts are extremely reluctant to punish false accusers, even where the man spent time in prison.

Does believing in the presumption of innocent make me a "rape apologist"? A rape accusation even without a conviction can damage a man's life forever. Perhaps we should be certain to a substantial degree before we lynch an innocent man (an oxymoron for a radfem).

Publicity stunt.... She is no more qualified than Denis Rodman. Korean politics is extremely complex and I doubt that is her area of expertise. It is a good way to inadvertently raise tensions rather than thaw them!

Would you be making the same rant about the angry lesbian couple who successfully sued to a Rhode Island schoolboard over "heteronormative" literature used in kindergarten or another lovely couple in the UK who got Father's Day card-making (but not Mother's Day card-making) banned on account that it is "insensitive"

This will likely be tossed on appeal. Even if he committed a crime known to law, it is doubtful an 18 year sentence would be upheld. You can commit a rape or murder and be out sooner than that. If the images were of children, that could be another thing. But as far as I know, the law does not protect people from

I am having "body image issues"; can we ban all beef-cake calendars and CK underwear models?

This is why the criminal justice system should remain apolitical. I fail to see any ground of appeal. Bear in mind the Crown can appeal on an error of law alone. Therefore, it is not open to the Crown to appeal on the basis that the jury acted unreasonable. Also the exclusion of evidence is a question of mixed law and

The case was properly rejected. Nothing in her evidence came close to meeting the threshold. Even in Canada, which is way more of a bastion of radical feminism that the US would not have decided the case any differently. There was a time when ridiculous gender discrimination claims were actually entertained by the

I fail to see any racism here. Bearing in mind it is a commentary and a dissection of her testimony, in a play-by-play manner. Describing a witness as "articulate" is common parlance in the legal profession. It is hardly restricted to some racial undertone when used in reference to a black person.

This is an amusing theory, but it is hardly viable. The Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) will have to be read in conjunction with existing statutory provisions. As far as I know the RFRA is not constitutional. Therefore, as a general principle in common law systems across the world, you cannot use one statute