I have met quite a few who vehemently reject transpeople, didn’t get into the specifics of differently-gendered people with them - and are very clear they are attracted to (cis) men, full stop, and (cis) women, full stop.
Apocalyptus
Apocalyptus
There no clear objective difference between bi and pan, it’s up to personal preference. Some people use both labels.
Pansexuality is valid, but Bisexuality has meant ‘two or more genders’, or ‘my gender and not my gender’ for a few decades now.
Traditionally Bisexuality actually had a stance of actively including attractions to trans and non binary people, since at least the 90s.
I identify as Bi because of the negative baggage. The baggage comes from outside the community, and I personally dislike the idea of having to change the way I describe myself because of bigoted people.
Also the official definition for Bisexuality has included attractions to non binary folks since the 90s.
No, the official definition for Bisexuality has included attractions to non binary folks since the 90s....
Now playing
I mean if it looks like this I’m all for it:
Well I wouldn’t know the specific reason, every person is different. There are multiple reasons they could be taking it.
If it helps, non binary doesn’t automatically mean aiming to appear completely androgynous.
Why? Disability advocates tend to prefer the word to other alternatives, although each individual of course has the final say as to how they are referred.
No, they are non binary and use they/them pronouns.
As someone with psych training I’m going to jump in here and say nah, bud, that isn’t how it works!
There are butch trans women as well, who don’t fit traditional gender roles. ‘Funnily’ enough, those women are often told they must not really be women after all for not performing their gender in a traditional way. And if they do perform it in a traditional way, they are told they are reinforcing gender roles and the…
Or maybe stuff like this is always subjective, and the writer genuinely think the best is what they have listed?
“neighboring countries like Saudi Arabia and Iran”
If only your politicians weren’t in the pocket of farming lobbyists they might do something useful, like ban the use of antibiotics as growth promoters.
Unfortunately even seeing someone to ‘rule it out’ can result in false negatives, given the woeful state of knowledge of autism even in the clinical field.
Well, this is extremely horrifying. And I imagine it’s still not horrifying enough to cause the farming industry to stop using antibiotics to make production cheaper, unfortunately.