AnnieSisk1
AnnieGotHerGum
AnnieSisk1

And Russia is run by a sociopath. Don’t forget the Russian sociopath.

Guys, anyone else looking back on the “extra hour in the ball pit” con/con with fond nostalgia now? Just me, then? K.

I truly think there’s some wish-fulfillment or faulty memory at work here because that’s literally all I remember in the way of response. Big ol’ steamy pile of “meh.” I didn’t read the book before watching the movie so I came into it totally unspoiled for the film experience, which I found to be thoroughly

Some states have even begun doing away with it. The condemned get whatever all the other inmates get for that meal.

HOLY SHIT GTFO OUT AND GO WATCH IT ALL RIGHT NOW. I mean. You must. You just must. VERY good.

WasTED. You’re all welcome.

Dude, I’m 50 and I’d watch the shit outta that show.

Thank God, seriously, because I was utterly gobsmacked and upset by some comments I read about the whole Blair Tindall/restraining order mess by some who claimed he ... wasn’t, and it just ... it really messed with my mind, y’all.

Theoretically, I guess, sure. (IAANALASBAMSWICMSA.**) Depends, as does so much in the law, on the specific facts. But it isn’t hard to conceive of a scenario in which a jury decides to nullify - that is, render a verdict contrary to the facts due to passion/prejudice - in which a key motivation is racial bias.

Example:

That baby girl’s side-eye game is STRONG, yo.

He could eat the ass out of a dead rhinoceros, ya know.

This is epic, btw. Highly appropriate. Two thumbs up in a lightning-bolt formation.

For real. My daughter and her friend, both 15 at the time, earnestly attempted to engage him and his fanboys in reasonable debate on Twitter (their first, second, and third mistakes, they now realize). It went as well as you’d imagine. Baldwin ended up insulting the friend, a beautiful African American girl, and her

Really? Under Armour?

Really? Under Armour?

Yeah I’m not sure they’re that bright. Definitely that fucking evil, though.

Please make this real and send me a link kthnxbai.

Yeah that’s not how that works, generally. Accessory/aid and abet laws require some kind of act in furtherance or protection or obscuration of the crime (actus reus - guilty act), plus the guilty knowledge (mens rea - guilty thoughts).

Crazy Days and Nights has been posting not-so-veiled blinds about Lautner and Lourd (sounds like a vaudeville team, maybe an upscale trendy boutique or a really bad grocery?) for a while now.

“You can churn that damn butter ‘til the cows come home but don’t you dare think I’m ever gonna spread it on my biscuits.”

It’s like the guy who decided that poor college professor was the Zodiac killer, and then getting tagged by other amateur detectives as the professor’s accomplice! Ah, karma, you are such a delightful little bitch sometimes.