They were having a conversation between themselves but they were not in private having a private conversation. There is a vast difference.
They were having a conversation between themselves but they were not in private having a private conversation. There is a vast difference.
Actually, his employer is the one who has control over his employment status, and he was fired for HIS behavior. Now, if you find his employer's reaction to this over zealous, you should take that up with them.
We wouldn't have Black Friday Christmas Brawls at the mall if it wasn't for the Cabbage Patch Kids. That was the beginning. Give them their due America!
"Those people posted those things themselves."
Many people have lost their jobs due to their activities that were posted on the internet (Hello Facebook). I would think someone working in the tech industry would be aware of this.
Well, actually, you should direct your ire at your company for firing you, they are the ones with the power there, not the person who took a photo of you in a public. And maybe you should look at your own behavior for which your company felt the need to fire you.
I just don't understand how men can be outraged when someone takes a photo of them in public and post it on the internet without their consent when they've been telling women to get over being photographed in public and posted on the internet without their consent..
So, you agree men are hysterically over-reacting?
So, you have impulse control problems, excellent, good for you.
Women in public have their pictures posted online without their consent all the time for the pleasure of other viewers. They are told to get over it, and that when in public nothing is private. Surely, a father of 3 working in tech is aware of this and should have conducted himself accordingly. Judging from his…