I think this sums up the comments: It looks like a bad combination of a Firebird, Camaro and a GTR.
I think this sums up the comments: It looks like a bad combination of a Firebird, Camaro and a GTR.
Then beat it with the ugly bat.
I actually do keep a log of everything, but with respect to the fuel side, what is really interesting is watching the mileage go up and down based on the weather over the year (I live in the middle of a Prairie in Canada. It gets cold. My mileage sucks [more]).
Try the newer ones. I'm 3 inches shorter and I had to crank the seat way forward just to reach the pedals. They seem to have made them a better fit for taller people in recent years.
Still waiting on my R18...
Not if. When.
I stand happily corrected.
I wish to draw my fellow Jalops to the following graphic. Who wants to sponsor Tobey? (I would, but I'm already committed)
More cars yes. Does he drive them? Not as I've heard. I think part of the requirement should be that they are car people, not just collectors.
My first thought was it looked like a Mercedes C class sedan. After having been beat severely with the ugly bat.
I don't know if it counts as a joke, but cutting down a Nissan Sentra to get better 1/4 mile times as he'd bet for pinks with a buddy. Friend of mine showed this to me 3 or 4 years ago, and I laughed so hard I couldn't breathe, and then chuckled about it for the next week.
Hearted for this.
No, because the computer, software and scanner cost a bucket of cash. That gets paid for a little bit from each transaction it is used for.
Damn! Well, at least it was while racing...
A little quirky, but Ferrari 312
I disagree with #7. They lost hope after the 3rd Gen. (1985 for Celica's, 1986.5 for Supra's)
Ahem. Mentioned in the post (and before in the comment train), the one, and original Audi Quattro is THE car to beat. There is no argument on this.
See, I disagree with you on this. I don't hate the colour. Nor do I like it. I am completely ambivalent about it. It is simply meh.
Hearted for that. Amen Brother!