Wait, so you're agreeing I'm correct- and somehow that makes me wrong.

The statement I was replying to claimed that they were interviewed, gave testimony, and presented all evidence.

You're admitting none of that is true, and somehow that means I have a low grasp of the information of the case- not the person that…

You didn't provide facts. You just outright lied for multiple paragraphs. No, I'm not going to read fiction. Just because you wrote something doesn't make it a fact.
You stated:
"The rape was investigated, evidence collected and an interview done immediately following the events."

The evidence stated:
"66 daysCLOSE…

I'm not actually going to read your entire fictional story. The facts are already out there, and they're in complete contradiction to everything you just wrote:

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/20…

I'm not sure why you think just typing a fictional narrative that doesn't align with any actual facts is somehow going…

Wait, so you're claiming the video corroborates it, or the testimony of the guy that deleted the video at least- and that is "evidence."

WHAT!?!??! No, deleting evidence and then stating your version of what the evidence was is not itself evidence, nor corroboration. It's actually the opposite, because any sane…

That's cute- you say the fact that he deleted the video corroborates that it was consensual? I'm not sure you understand what the word "corroborates" means.

And your race baiting is pathetic. You can actually look at my comment history and realize that's a ridiculous distraction. It's also funny coming from a guy…

Alleged rape (not investigated), theft caught on video (suspension from baseball instead of football), screaming offensive things on campus (half game suspension from crappy game), fighting during baseball (no football suspension).

Those are all real things, with no real punishment to him in the football arena, as not…

You just listed a bunch of random insults and no actual evidence to counter anything.

4 sentences, 0 substance. Congratulations.

Cognitive dissonance.

It's all a conspiracy! Rape, assault, brandishing firearms, drunk driving- it's all faked to get clicks on a website!

You're a jackass. There have been smaller scandals that involve 0 actual illegal activity that got more national coverage than this did- tattoogate for Ohio State for instance.

Now how about you go…

Wait... so your initial claim- obviously not actually having read the report- was that the DNA swab wasn't necessary because the alleged assailant admitted to sexual contact with the defendant.

The author quite nicely responds to your bullshit complaint, and blows it out of the water with a specific quote from the…

"Remember that one time, 60 years ago, when you were wrong?"

"Ummm... yeah. I'm pretty fucking kickass that I only had to issue one retraction in 60 years of journalism, right?"

"Yeah, gotta say, great career. To think it started on some silly website that had a running series of articles called 'Is That a Dick?' "

This is my favorite example of dealing with a troll ever.

That's fair and I mostly agree. I like and agree with the vast majority of the article, just not so much the click-bait headline- and the argument that many here are making that white people should be silent allies- which in my opinion aren't allies at all.

I love you.

Yes, let's all be quiet about this serious issue with our broken government. Also, let's stop doing civil disobedience and just look disapprovingly look at government buildings when we walk by instead of stopping all traffic on public roads. We need to be less obvious with our displeasure with the system, because…

THIS.

"Good white people" talking about deleting trolls, going to protests, or whatever else may very well not have an ulterior motive. This author is talking about deleting trolls, is she looking to be congratulated and thanked?

Part of what is being done is exerting social pressure on their borderline white friends…

When the Duke case is brought up to discredit all rape accusations, just like when OJ Simpson is brought up to discredit all accusations of a racial bias in our judicial system- it is most definitely a sign of the bigotry of the person using the bullshit argument.

I really don't need a speech from your dumb ass about…

Ummm.... nope... tons of us have screamed quite loud about Polanski and Allen before. They both have removed quite a bit of vitriol over the years- which was well deserved.

The bullshit idea that we can't yell about one rapist unless we're simultaneous yelling about some other person that did something terrible is a…

It'll be more than a year. Every time you discuss a woman's claims that she was raped, apologists STILL bring up Duke. For those people, one negative completely disproves all positives.

That's cute... you have no argument, so all you can do is insult me.

You'll notice, I insulted you as well, but I actually used logical arguments as well. It's how intelligent people debate things, but you're one of those people that are too damned ignorant to realize how stupid they are.

You want me to assume what you think is different between Zimmerman and Wilson?

Really? That's the best argument you have? You can't actually make a factual basis for why Zimmerman did not have the lawful right to kill Trayvon Martin, Wilson did have a lawful right to kill Brown, and Pantaleo had a legal right to…