Call me a throwback, but I prefer SVO. Seeing as that's not an option, SVT is the better name for sure.

You know what else had a crap interior? The Ferrari F40.

Because that hard plastic and interior build quality means oh so much in what is essentially a street legal race car.

You typed "what I've seen", but you forgot to add "5 years ago".

How is the Charger smaller than the Challenger?

03-04 Cobras followed this trend as well I remember. They were advertised as 390HP, but quite a few were doing that or better at the wheels right off the showroom floor.

Agreed. Although me thinks they look better on the Mustang.

this is actually a sane answer, something surprising on Jalopnik

Ford has been pretty good about not having too many diesel failures, just 2 years of bad ones

I was just stopping by to recommend the Flex as well. I bought one on Saturday! AWD, twin turbo, 2nd row bucket seats, LOTS of leg room in all three rows. It was the best compromise on form and function I could find. Sport mode and paddle shifters help my ego a tiny bit.

Ecoboost Flex. 365hp/350tq. 0-60 in 5.7, 1/4 mile in 14.2 - certainly in the same league as a 335xi (5.4, 14.0). And just pop in a 91 or 93 octane tune in the Flex and you're walking away from the Bimmer, turbos singing.

Ford flex awd twin turbo three rows of seats. I'd post the video of its on the 1/4 mile but I'm on my phone and my other hand has a beer in it besides all these comments sit in pending Status for weeks so what's the use. What's the question again now?

"Just look at it, there aren't any straight lines anywhere, simply elegant curves that convey an absolutely unmistakeable shape. Keep in mind this car was being sold alongside cars like the "design by etch-a-sketch" Chevrolet Caprice. The RX7 was a game changer."

A car having a low purchase price doesn't make it cheap, it makes it cheap to buy. These are NOT cheap to own.

31 mpg? Yeah, that's pretty decent for a 3,500 lb car with a 17 year old engine based on a 52 year old block.

I'm throwing this out there.... but maybe... just maybe... there is a rear wheel drive Lincoln in our future. We keep saying if Lincoln is going to compete, they need a rear drive car. At the same time, if Ford is going to stay true to their green image, they are going to need their hybrids. Think about it. 1.5L…

They gimped it, that is why it failed. It was basically just stop start.

Since no one has yet come to point out how off your comment is I will. This is stupid.

Definitely not. The 240 has one of the most awkward C pillars ever. The backseat window droops down, and then the cargo window is straight again.

(Puts on flame suit)