907games
TheWiz907
907games

A business has every right to protect its interests plain and simple. So regardless of whomever may own the video, claim or otherwise, the content is still offensive. Therefore if a video is displaying offensive content and someone sees a Toyota ad before the video its safe to assume that person may believe that

I had thought yesterday and earlier today that you were very protective of your work which on the whole is very good. But to patronize the community at large is terrible. You are representing Kotaku on the weekends and while its great that you engage readers when they comment, you are demonstrating a complete lack of

I believe that you are missing my point. Substance is not the same as length. I do not know how to write in a friendly tone and its understandable for people to be upset. Im interested in this being a widespread issue or just a lone incident. What kinds of new things have you discovered in your new play throughs? That

Oh my friend, I believe you may have written that for someone else. My name is certainly not Jesus.

Very insightful. I like how well versed you are in your rebuttal. I guess we are birds of a feather.

I did read those articles and had no issues with them. My comment was a critique of this article in question. So when measured up with all the other articles you've written today. This one stands out as weak. You may not see it in the same light as I do and that is ok. So I ask you. In comparison to your other works

I love Kotaku and appreciate the words of wisdom that the talented staff output on a daily basis. That being said, this is an extremely weak article for a news publication site. Save file is corrupted, ok you’ve got my attention. However there is no substance other than you’ve experienced the game from a different