For those of you keeping score at home:

I was expecting the link between the erosion and climate change to be from a 3rd party assessment. The fact that they explicitly admit it is... impressive hypocrisy.

Donald Trump, a piece of shit whose only conviction is that he always deserves to win,

Strongly agree! It seems that people remember the Holocaust(images of death camps, stories of survivors) but not enough about how it came to fruition which is absolutely crucial to never letting it happen again.

You know, my first instinct was to think he was Godwining himself. But then you read things like this:

I would like to know the answer to this, for accurate daydreaming next time I buy a lotto ticket.

Cue the religious assholes and their “...but assisted suicide is inhumane!!!” bullshit.

So let me get this right accusations by women with no corroborating evidence against Trump are just rumours being generated by the left wing media and should be ignored but accusation by women with no corroborating evidence against Clinton are perfectly valid material to use when Trump is campaigning. I would wonder…

Well he did rename a couple of post offices and vote against gun regulations. Plus there was his deal to ship Vermont’s toxic waste to a largely Hispanic community in Texas.

How is someone with a very liberal senate voting record, more liberal than our current president’s when he was in the senate, practically a republican?

I’m sorry, death threats, threats of violence, and slurs from Hillary supporters? Where please?

*eyeroll*

Yeah, she’s a real moderate Republican:

Jeez, you’re as a bad as men who start notallmenning you the minute you point out problems among men.

Nothing about Hillary Clinton’s proposals are moderate Republican. She’s left of Obama. There’s a reason why the GOP has aggressively gone after her for 30 years. Or do you have an explanation for that, too? Part of another conspiracy, maybe? Her current policies are contained by one thing: her analysis of what she…

Can we please stop with the calling the 11th most liberal senator “pretty much a moderate republican?” I get it, it sounds good, but c’mon. Let’s not do this here.

A few times? You mean once. Many candidates run for president multiple times (Sanders has also run and lost before, it’s ok). Her voting record puts her no where near the Republicans.

America has chosen to elect other people they liked more than Hillary, yes, but now that the person who beat her has termed out, we can turn to her. That’s not a rejection of Hillary, it’s merely a “I liked Obama more, but now that we can’t have him, we’ll do second-best and elect her.” Falling back to #2 when #1 is…

Yeah, it just bugs the hell out of me that they were asked to do the bare minimum of what they were supposed to, show up, register and confirm we've got your info correct; couldn't be bothered to do even that...and suddenly IT'S NOT DEMOCRACY!!!

It’s simple, Matt. And I’ll use the most basic examples.