Whoa, the R word. So progressive of you.  AOC fans are so “woke”.

HAHA you idiot, you think incentives don’t work, ever, so the gov’t needs to resort to bans.   Behold evilface, the economics prodigy.

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA  She wants a living wage for those unwilling to work.  Truth hurts.

If the cheeto in chief sent a tweet saying we are NOT donating any money to the French for ND because they wouldn’t support us in Iraq, the left would be all up in arms just the same.

You have won the internet today good sir.  Or madam.

LOL you may be the most unhinged of all the unhinged AOC fans.  I’m sorry her ideas have you so upset, but even she realized how stupid it was so of course she walked it back.  The point is it gives great insight to how her peabrain works, and what she wants, and it’s so looney even the dems lashed out at her.  So she…

No, it makes it a fact that GM was fond of rotaries. Just like AOC is fond of “economic security for those unwilling to work”. Yes I quoted that from her FAQ. Dipshit.

Gen Xers are still very into hotrods, so you might get pretty old waiting for a bubble to burst...haha

Yikes.

Agreed, especially in the faster sections. SFA still has areas of advantages though, i.e. in the big rocks I believe. Good luck with your truck, what a fun thing to build and race, literally a bucket list thing for so many people and you’re living it.

Agreed.  Doesn’t mean it’s always better.

HAHA I present the 2016 King of Hammers winner:

Agreed.  The “study” was probably funded by someone heavily invested in the aviation industry.  Can’t stand this biased bullshit.

This.

Without at least 150hp a sled is almost worthless in the woods where we go (Montana, deep powder and large avalanche chutes)

Your example has 2 clear sets of goals with obvious different timeframes. Can you show me where her list of goals are seperated out as to which ones are in the 10yr range and which ones aren’t? Hint: you cannot, because even she doesn’t know.

That’s good for cities, but not for the tens of millions of people living in suburban/rural america.  Which are so spread out that public transit becomes way more difficult than asia, europe, etc.

Using conductors in that environment is asking for issues (road grime, impact from trucks/cars). And wireless charging is inefficient, the grid in the ground idea would be expensive since they have to be very very long and none of that infrastructure exists, re-paving the roadway becomes much harder, the system may…

If you build a doc that says these are our goals and the timeframe is 10yrs. Then list one of the goals to replace all ICE, another goal is to get carbon-free, etc. etc. etc. you can’t just pick out one and say “oh I didn’t mean that goal wouldn’t have a 10yr timeframe”. It’s disingenuous backpedaling. Mostly because…

Uh oh I think we found someone this applies to: