You started it.
My feeling is that it’s not possible for a person to base every decision and behavior on sound scientific proof. Sometimes common sense is a better approach.
You started it.
My feeling is that it’s not possible for a person to base every decision and behavior on sound scientific proof. Sometimes common sense is a better approach.
Doesn’t common sense tell you that wide-spread use of toxic chemicals in agriculture seem maybe kind of short-sighted and bad?
How does it feel to shill for free?
Right, it can’t be proven safe. So why do proponents say it is? Wouldn’t that be pseudo-scientific?
Why not equate them? They’re both points-of-view pushed by environmentally destructive corporate interests.
GMOs = doused in carcinogens. I think genetic modification has exciting possibilities, but all the stuff they spew about feeding the world is propaganda.
But won’t people be confused by all the information? How would anyone ever be able to feed themselves!?
Considering GMOs act on every possible system of life, it’s impossible to scientifically prove that they do not cause harm.
Oz is the Oprah of supplements. I used to shill holistic health type products in a health food store. Without a doubt, if he recommended an unfounded alternative remedy, we’d sell out in a day and be flooded with back orders.
But they both apply.
100 years of “women’s chess”, and a whole human history of women’s oppression.
Right, my mistake, you’re not him. You’re just defending his bigoted point of view. However, it’s not a rule, its a fact, borne of circumstances that have nothing to do with inherent ability. Facts don’t reveal much without context.
The rule that women are inferior? Can you please take your time machine back to the ‘50s where you came from?
It’s a matter of common sense, for which I cite myself as the source.
I heard a crying man is half a man
I’m sure they’re just as capable, given the opportunity. Hillary 2016!
...citation needed.
Please, I wore my girlfriends skinny jeans to the grocery store. I’ve been called homophobic shit often just for wearing trendy clothes, let alone women’s clothes. And, in fact, I do own and wear scarves, mostly around my neck, but I guess I can wrap them around my head to get an education in feminism.
I guess if I were covered to the extent that I passed for a woman, then I might learn something about male privilege, but just being a man with open eyes is pretty informative, too.
A cross is a symbol of ‘80s Madonna and sanctimonious dipshits, as far as I’m concerned. If I wore one, again as a white man, I wouldn’t learn anything about male privilege. All of the lessons would be about expectations of masculinity.